Title |
Osteopathic manipulative treatment for nonspecific low back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, August 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2474-15-286 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Helge Franke, Jan-David Franke, Gary Fryer |
Abstract |
Nonspecific back pain is common, disabling, and costly. Therefore, we assessed effectiveness of osteopathic manipulative treatment (OMT) in the management of nonspecific low back pain (LBP) regarding pain and functional status. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 116 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 15 | 13% |
United Kingdom | 15 | 13% |
United States | 8 | 7% |
France | 5 | 4% |
Belgium | 4 | 3% |
Australia | 4 | 3% |
Italy | 4 | 3% |
Canada | 3 | 3% |
Saudi Arabia | 3 | 3% |
Other | 10 | 9% |
Unknown | 45 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 99 | 85% |
Scientists | 9 | 8% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 8 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 608 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Spain | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 606 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 104 | 17% |
Student > Bachelor | 89 | 15% |
Student > Postgraduate | 42 | 7% |
Researcher | 37 | 6% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 36 | 6% |
Other | 93 | 15% |
Unknown | 207 | 34% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 194 | 32% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 115 | 19% |
Sports and Recreations | 15 | 2% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 2% |
Neuroscience | 11 | 2% |
Other | 40 | 7% |
Unknown | 222 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 113. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 May 2024.
All research outputs
#381,675
of 25,907,102 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#30
of 4,464 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,354
of 248,967 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#1
of 101 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,907,102 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,464 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 248,967 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 101 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.