Language and socioeconomics predict geographic variation in peer review outcomes at an ecology journal

@Amit_Kumar_PhD Europe includes the UK in the analysis in the figure. Here's a study that separates out the UK: https://t.co/0cda6hkf2V

@SuburbanYute @imwithdick @NeuroticCanAdN less likely to receive grant finding (example: https://t.co/bpFpHvmdL4), are less likely to have papers favorably reviewed (https://t.co/E9olLGx2D8 --this one is about nationality, not race, but it's still relevant

RT @Research_Voice: Why are papers by UK/US #scientists faring better in #peerreview than those submitted by scientists from elsewhere? htt…

RT @Research_Voice: Why are papers by UK/US #scientists faring better in #peerreview than those submitted by scientists from elsewhere? htt…

Language and socioeconomics predict geographic variation in peer review outcomes at an ecology journal. https://t.co/4qaBbf85bv

RT @Research_Voice: Why are papers by UK/US #scientists faring better in #peerreview than those submitted by scientists from elsewhere? htt…

RT @Research_Voice: Why are papers by UK/US #scientists faring better in #peerreview than those submitted by scientists from elsewhere? htt…

RT @Research_Voice: Why are papers by UK/US #scientists faring better in #peerreview than those submitted by scientists from elsewhere? htt…

Why are papers by UK/US #scientists faring better in #peerreview than those submitted by scientists from elsewhere? https://t.co/U1pQLfRsmk