↓ Skip to main content

ESICM LIVES 2017

Overview of attention for article published in Intensive Care Medicine Experimental, September 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#10 of 366)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
43 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
146 Mendeley
Title
ESICM LIVES 2017
Published in
Intensive Care Medicine Experimental, September 2017
DOI 10.1186/s40635-017-0151-4
Pubmed ID

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 43 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 146 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 146 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 24 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 14%
Student > Bachelor 18 12%
Researcher 12 8%
Student > Postgraduate 10 7%
Other 23 16%
Unknown 39 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 39 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 22 15%
Engineering 8 5%
Computer Science 7 5%
Psychology 4 3%
Other 19 13%
Unknown 47 32%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 April 2018.
All research outputs
#1,032,630
of 18,925,350 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine Experimental
#10
of 366 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,153
of 287,230 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine Experimental
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,925,350 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 366 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 287,230 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them