↓ Skip to main content

Erratum to: Prediction of vulnerability to bipolar disorder using multivariate neurocognitive patterns: a pilot study

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Bipolar Disorders, September 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
Title
Erratum to: Prediction of vulnerability to bipolar disorder using multivariate neurocognitive patterns: a pilot study
Published in
International Journal of Bipolar Disorders, September 2017
DOI 10.1186/s40345-017-0105-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mon-Ju Wu, Benson Mwangi, Ives Cavalcante Passos, Isabelle E. Bauer, Bo Cao, Thomas W. Frazier, Giovana B. Zunta-Soares, Jair C. Soares

Abstract

In the original version of this article (Wu et al. 2017), published on 1 September 2017, the name of author 'Bo Cao' was wrongly displayed. In this Erratum the incorrect name and correct name are shown. The original publication of this article has been corrected.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 1 100%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 September 2017.
All research outputs
#12,843,087
of 14,537,474 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Bipolar Disorders
#183
of 199 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#233,794
of 273,734 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Bipolar Disorders
#4
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,537,474 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 199 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 273,734 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.