↓ Skip to main content

Microbiome Diversity and Asthma and Allergy Risk

Overview of attention for article published in Current Allergy and Asthma Reports, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
60 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
160 Mendeley
Title
Microbiome Diversity and Asthma and Allergy Risk
Published in
Current Allergy and Asthma Reports, August 2014
DOI 10.1007/s11882-014-0466-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Antje Legatzki, Barbara Rösler, Erika von Mutius

Abstract

The prevalence of asthma and allergy has been constantly increasing in Westernized countries in the last decades. Asthma and allergies are complex diseases with a local tissue inflammation that are determined by genetic and environmental factors. Because the commensal microflora is crucial to maintain inflammatory homeostasis and to induce immune regulation, the microbiome may play an important role for the development of allergic conditions. New techniques such as next-generation sequencing methods give the opportunity to explore the microbial community structure of the human body comprehensively. In this review, we will discuss the available literature concerning the human microbiota and asthma and allergy development and occurrence. The focus is on studies of the local microbiome of the place of inflammation, the gastrointestinal microbiome, and the influence of intrinsic factors relating to the host and extrinsic factors relating to the external environment on the microbiome.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 160 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Thailand 1 <1%
Unknown 155 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 25 16%
Researcher 24 15%
Student > Bachelor 22 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 12%
Other 11 7%
Other 31 19%
Unknown 28 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 43 27%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 32 20%
Immunology and Microbiology 17 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 6%
Other 15 9%
Unknown 31 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 August 2019.
All research outputs
#5,579,112
of 22,710,079 outputs
Outputs from Current Allergy and Asthma Reports
#220
of 803 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,506
of 235,596 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Allergy and Asthma Reports
#6
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,710,079 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 803 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 235,596 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.