↓ Skip to main content

Indirect Trophalaxis and Courtship Behaviour in the Nothybidae

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Insect Behavior, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
Title
Indirect Trophalaxis and Courtship Behaviour in the Nothybidae
Published in
Journal of Insect Behavior, August 2014
DOI 10.1007/s10905-014-9461-5
Authors

S. M. Paiero, S. A. Marshall

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 1 33%
Student > Bachelor 1 33%
Student > Master 1 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 67%
Psychology 1 33%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 June 2019.
All research outputs
#3,956,453
of 14,027,165 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Insect Behavior
#71
of 443 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,909
of 200,001 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Insect Behavior
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,027,165 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 443 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 200,001 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.