↓ Skip to main content

Erratum to: Development of a circulation direct sampling and monitoring system for O2 and CO2 concentrations in the gas–liquid phases of shake‑flask systems during microbial cell culture

Overview of attention for article published in AMB Express, September 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
Title
Erratum to: Development of a circulation direct sampling and monitoring system for O2 and CO2 concentrations in the gas–liquid phases of shake‑flask systems during microbial cell culture
Published in
AMB Express, September 2017
DOI 10.1186/s13568-017-0481-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Masato Takahashi, Yoshisuke Sawada, Hideki Aoyagi

Abstract

Following publication of the original article (Takahashi et al. 2017), the authors reported that there was a mistake in the legend of Figure 2.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 1 100%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 September 2017.
All research outputs
#15,479,632
of 23,002,898 outputs
Outputs from AMB Express
#447
of 1,240 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#199,718
of 318,311 outputs
Outputs of similar age from AMB Express
#14
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,002,898 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,240 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 318,311 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.