↓ Skip to main content

Augmented visual, auditory, haptic, and multimodal feedback in motor learning: A review

Overview of attention for article published in Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
8 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
365 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
787 Mendeley
Title
Augmented visual, auditory, haptic, and multimodal feedback in motor learning: A review
Published in
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, November 2012
DOI 10.3758/s13423-012-0333-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Roland Sigrist, Georg Rauter, Robert Riener, Peter Wolf

Abstract

It is generally accepted that augmented feedback, provided by a human expert or a technical display, effectively enhances motor learning. However, discussion of the way to most effectively provide augmented feedback has been controversial. Related studies have focused primarily on simple or artificial tasks enhanced by visual feedback. Recently, technical advances have made it possible also to investigate more complex, realistic motor tasks and to implement not only visual, but also auditory, haptic, or multimodal augmented feedback. The aim of this review is to address the potential of augmented unimodal and multimodal feedback in the framework of motor learning theories. The review addresses the reasons for the different impacts of feedback strategies within or between the visual, auditory, and haptic modalities and the challenges that need to be overcome to provide appropriate feedback in these modalities, either in isolation or in combination. Accordingly, the design criteria for successful visual, auditory, haptic, and multimodal feedback are elaborated.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 787 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 8 1%
United Kingdom 7 <1%
Switzerland 5 <1%
Japan 4 <1%
France 3 <1%
Canada 3 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Portugal 2 <1%
Italy 2 <1%
Other 13 2%
Unknown 738 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 206 26%
Student > Master 183 23%
Researcher 85 11%
Student > Bachelor 79 10%
Unspecified 54 7%
Other 180 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 218 28%
Computer Science 106 13%
Psychology 98 12%
Unspecified 85 11%
Sports and Recreations 70 9%
Other 210 27%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 January 2018.
All research outputs
#1,076,059
of 12,940,177 outputs
Outputs from Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
#214
of 1,589 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,242
of 199,464 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
#8
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,940,177 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,589 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 199,464 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.