↓ Skip to main content

Best practice guidelines for idiopathic nephrotic syndrome: recommendations versus reality

Overview of attention for article published in Pediatric Nephrology, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
88 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Best practice guidelines for idiopathic nephrotic syndrome: recommendations versus reality
Published in
Pediatric Nephrology, August 2014
DOI 10.1007/s00467-014-2903-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andrea Pasini, Gabriella Aceto, Anita Ammenti, Gianluigi Ardissino, Vitalba Azzolina, Alberto Bettinelli, Elena Cama, Sante Cantatore, Antonella Crisafi, Giovanni Conti, Maria D’Agostino, Alessandra Dozza, Alberto Edefonti, Carmelo Fede, Elena Groppali, Chiara Gualeni, Alessandra Lavacchini, Marta Lepore, Silvio Maringhini, Paola Mariotti, Marco Materassi, Francesca Mencarelli, Giovanni Messina, Amata Negri, Marina Piepoli, Fiammetta Ravaglia, Angela Simoni, Laura Spagnoletta, Giovanni Montini, On behalf of the NefroKid Study Group

Abstract

The optimal therapeutic regimen for managing childhood idiopathic nephrotic syndrome (INS) is still under debate. We have evaluated the choice of steroid regimen and of symptomatic treatment adopted by pediatricians and pediatric nephrologists in a large number of centers as the first step towards establishing a shared protocol

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 88 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 10 11%
Student > Postgraduate 9 10%
Student > Master 9 10%
Student > Bachelor 9 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 8%
Other 26 30%
Unknown 18 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 45 51%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 3%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 24 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 July 2016.
All research outputs
#14,783,695
of 22,760,687 outputs
Outputs from Pediatric Nephrology
#2,538
of 3,534 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#129,045
of 234,981 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pediatric Nephrology
#27
of 71 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,760,687 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,534 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 234,981 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 71 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.