Publication bias (the preferential dissemination of statistically significant studies) is not a new issue, but this paper from Daniele Fanelli @DFanDaBiasedMan suggests that the preponderance of positive studies rose between 1990 and 2007: https://t.co/c
Today emak learning about publication bias in research findings plethora. "The disappearing case of (statistically significant finding from) negative results (Fanelli, 2012)" https://t.co/LYebJcviDC #primotslearn 3/n https://t.co/cZalyao7U3
Conservatives' confidence in science has plummeted in recent decades. As a Democrat and scientist, this bothers me a lot. Yet, the upward trend in publication bias (see Fanelli, 2012) suggests moderating one's confidence is not entirely unreasonable. htt
Negative results are disappearing from most disciplines and countries https://t.co/dR8PC1Ql5q
@StephenEglen @lakens @chrisdc77 @Ben_C_J Yes, or a paper like this might work (let me know if you don't have access) https://t.co/YNVyyuHNFW
RT @AndyRShaw2000: Interesting thought. We actually discussed the “positive bias” in IWA and WEF modeling meetings. It’s all but impossible…
Interesting thought. We actually discussed the “positive bias” in IWA and WEF modeling meetings. It’s all but impossible to publish negative outcomes or failing research. Almost always there’s the pressure to put a positive spin or…https://t.co/0TLBNTfKmP
RT @jmmorang: El estudio de Fanelli en 2012 (periodo 1990-2007) alcanza en 2007 un 85% de estudios con resultados positivos. NO PUEDE SER…
RT @TheNewStats: @jd_wilko Here's data (slightly out of date) by discipline and country: https://t.co/PC0yYg7HBI In psych, probably no var…
@jd_wilko Here's data (slightly out of date) by discipline and country: https://t.co/PC0yYg7HBI In psych, probably no variation by journal because up until recently >95% of studies support the hypothesis: https://t.co/BqiiCJ63Uy and https://t.co/L6qvn2
RT @timovt: gerade in der keynote von @peterpur Negative results are disappearing from most disciplines and countries https://t.co/LdtHRgKE…
RT @timovt: gerade in der keynote von @peterpur Negative results are disappearing from most disciplines and countries https://t.co/LdtHRgKE…
gerade in der keynote von @peterpur Negative results are disappearing from most disciplines and countries https://t.co/LdtHRgKEQ1 #gmw16
RT @MethodsSchool: ... and not take comfort in the fact that the social sciences are in the middle of the pack (cf. https://t.co/j8nrwrlTTe…
RT @MethodsSchool: ... and not take comfort in the fact that the social sciences are in the middle of the pack (cf. https://t.co/j8nrwrlTTe…
... and not take comfort in the fact that the social sciences are in the middle of the pack (cf. https://t.co/j8nrwrlTTe behind paywall).
RT @dsquintana: Negative results are disappearing from most disciplines and countries https://t.co/wyuBJeh7ny https://t.co/cbkYnVryHS
RT @dsquintana: Negative results are disappearing from most disciplines and countries https://t.co/wyuBJeh7ny https://t.co/cbkYnVryHS
Negative results are disappearing from most disciplines and countries https://t.co/wyuBJeh7ny https://t.co/cbkYnVryHS
@lteytelman @MHendr1cks Fanelli did a study suggesting that publication bias, at least, seems to be on the rise. http://t.co/Ux3N42qdED
@lteytelman @MHendr1cks Fanelli did a study suggesting that publication bias, at least, seems to be on the rise. http://t.co/Ux3N42qdED
@lteytelman @MHendr1cks Fanelli did a study suggesting that publication bias, at least, seems to be on the rise. http://t.co/Ux3N42qdED
@lteytelman @MHendr1cks Fanelli did a study suggesting that publication bias, at least, seems to be on the rise. http://t.co/Ux3N42qdED
SCIENCE UNDER SEIGE: "growing competition for funding...might pressure scientists to...falsify their data". http://t.co/uoww2Fmau5
SCIENCE UNDER SEIGE: "growing competition for funding...might pressure scientists to...falsify their data". http://t.co/uoww2Fmau5
SCIENCE UNDER SEIGE: "growing competition for funding...might pressure scientists to...falsify their data". http://t.co/uoww2Fmau5
SCIENCE UNDER SEIGE: "growing competition for funding...might pressure scientists to...falsify their data". http://t.co/uoww2Fmau5
Hmmmmm........."Negative results are disappearing from most disciplines and countries" http://t.co/a0XWMATBc7
Negative results in science are disappearing from most disciplines and countries. http://t.co/R8DfWXmY50 via @revnaturalista
Negative results in science are disappearing from most disciplines and countries. http://t.co/R8DfWXmY50 via @revnaturalista
Negative results in science are disappearing from most disciplines and countries. http://t.co/R8DfWXmY50 via @revnaturalista
Negative results in science are disappearing from most disciplines and countries. http://t.co/R8DfWXmY50 via @revnaturalista
Negative results in science are disappearing from most disciplines and countries. http://t.co/R8DfWXmY50 via @revnaturalista
Negative results in science are disappearing from most disciplines and countries. http://t.co/R8DfWXmY50 via @revnaturalista
Frequency of negative results declines in scientific papers: selection bias or decline in risk-taking? -- http://t.co/xUmDtGAbb0
Frequency of negative results declines in scientific papers: selection bias or decline in risk-taking? -- http://t.co/xUmDtGAbb0
@CoyneoftheRealm got it (I think) Fanelli (2012). Negative results are disappearing [...] http://t.co/Odz2lW1ewL http://t.co/MsyLTbtQOT
Negative results are disappearing from most disciplines and countries | http://t.co/ZVTvfGZnfk #springerlink
Positive outcome bias in the sciences http://t.co/QFn6hgeeHb
Zie publicatie: Alleen positieve resultaten lijken te tellen. Negatieve zeker zo belangrijk!#wetenschapsvertouwen http://t.co/WBlmQU3M
Zie publicatie: Alleen positieve resultaten lijken te tellen. Negatieve zeker zo belangrijk!#wetenschapsvertouwen http://t.co/WBlmQU3M
Zie publicatie: Alleen positieve resultaten lijken te tellen. Negatieve zeker zo belangrijk!#wetenschapsvertouwen http://t.co/WBlmQU3M
1990年~2007年の間にポジティブな結果ばかり報告するバイアスが22%以上も増加。社会科学や生医学で多い。アジア、アメリカ、ヨーロッパの順で顕著。Negative results are disappearing from … http://t.co/ngFdVgUW
1990年~2007年の間にポジティブな結果ばかり報告するバイアスが22%以上も増加。社会科学や生医学で多い。アジア、アメリカ、ヨーロッパの順で顕著。Negative results are disappearing from … http://t.co/ngFdVgUW
1990年~2007年の間にポジティブな結果ばかり報告するバイアスが22%以上も増加。社会科学や生医学で多い。アジア、アメリカ、ヨーロッパの順で顕著。Negative results are disappearing from … http://t.co/ngFdVgUW
Hypotheses were 22% more frequently confirmed in papers from 2007 than in 1990. It's probably not that we got smarter: http://t.co/cJuJ7TRQ
1990年~2007年の間にポジティブな結果ばかり報告するバイアスが22%以上も増加。社会科学や生医学で多い。アジア、アメリカ、ヨーロッパの順で顕著。Negative results are disappearing from … http://t.co/ngFdVgUW
1990年~2007年の間にポジティブな結果ばかり報告するバイアスが22%以上も増加。社会科学や生医学で多い。アジア、アメリカ、ヨーロッパの順で顕著。Negative results are disappearing from … http://t.co/ngFdVgUW
1990年~2007年の間にポジティブな結果ばかり報告するバイアスが22%以上も増加。社会科学や生医学で多い。アジア、アメリカ、ヨーロッパの順で顕著。Negative results are disappearing from … http://t.co/ngFdVgUW
Negative results are disappearing from most disciplines and countries http://t.co/0r78KZgP
Connotea: Negative results are disappearing from most disciplines and countries: Posted by andym to "Negative re... http://t.co/AcDOBllY
Research becoming less pioneering and objectivity with which results are produced and published is decreasing http://t.co/HLKPq04E
RT @psychopium: La pression des résultats positifs met la science en danger http://t.co/8sH9osO4 (+ http://t.co/27A2zf5V
La pression des résultats positifs met la science en danger http://t.co/8sH9osO4 (+ http://t.co/27A2zf5V
As scientific funding dries up does science suffer? “@Globecarolynyj: Disturbing study-negative results disappearing http://t.co/sZOkPz8E”
RT @Globecarolynyj: Disturbing study - negative results disappearing. Papers that tested a hypothesis and found support up 22% over 17 yrs http://ow.ly/6BZBg
Disturbing study - negative results disappearing. Papers that tested a hypothesis and found support up 22% over 17 yrs http://ow.ly/6BZBg
Interesting paper at http://t.co/jdFplCTx 'Negative results are disappearing from most disciplines and countries' but raises some concerns.
RT @nutrigenomics: #Science: "Negative results are disappearing from most disciplines and countries"...Objectivity ... is decreasing...http://t.co/U0Y1Z0BQ
RT @nutrigenomics: #Science: "Negative results are disappearing from most disciplines and countries"...Objectivity ... is decreasing...http://t.co/U0Y1Z0BQ
RT @nutrigenomics: #Science: "Negative results are disappearing from most disciplines and countries"...Objectivity ... is decreasing...http://t.co/U0Y1Z0BQ
#Science: "Negative results are disappearing from most disciplines and countries"...Objectivity ... is decreasing...http://t.co/U0Y1Z0BQ
@atscommunity Something for the ATS journals to consider in their policy: http://t.co/Z1Tza1Ac
Growing competition for funding and citations might distort science http://t.co/3In9z513
MauraVU: http://t.co/TSGxj0t4 objectivity in research when competition is high!
http://t.co/VBY7EUQR objectivity in research when competition is high!
hooray GLS for hall of failure, this is problem all over: RT @carlton Negative results are disappearing from research. http://t.co/VOdiCMF
This is what happens when researchers struggle to get funding [Article] http://t.co/OJt2hb1 via @WestPeter
Negative results are disappearing from most disciplines and countries http://t.co/UYTQ3ks
[Article] Negative results are disappearing from most disciplines and countries http://t.co/rvSp2sF (Scientometrics) #KM $