↓ Skip to main content

Interactions between engineered nanomaterials and agricultural crops: implications for food safety

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Zhejiang University - Science A, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

weibo
2 weibo users

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
53 Mendeley
Title
Interactions between engineered nanomaterials and agricultural crops: implications for food safety
Published in
Journal of Zhejiang University - Science A, August 2014
DOI 10.1631/jzus.a1400165
Authors

Ying-qing Deng, Jason C. White, Bao-shan Xing

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 53 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unknown 53 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unknown 53 100%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 November 2014.
All research outputs
#7,229,047
of 13,045,091 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Zhejiang University - Science A
#101
of 113 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#79,022
of 198,857 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Zhejiang University - Science A
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,045,091 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 113 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 198,857 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them