| Title |
Health system challenges for the management of cardiovascular disease and diabetes: an empirical qualitative study from Syria
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Public Health, August 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00038-014-0594-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Balsam Ahmad, Fouad M. Fouad, Madonna Elias, Shahaduz Zaman, Peter Phillimore, Wasim Maziak |
| Abstract |
To explore through empirical qualitative data health system barriers to effective management of cardiovascular disease and diabetes in Syria before the crisis, and how such analysis can inform the building of a post-crisis system. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 40% |
| United States | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 40% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 40% |
| Scientists | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 80 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 17 | 21% |
| Researcher | 12 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 9% |
| Other | 10 | 13% |
| Unknown | 14 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 24 | 30% |
| Social Sciences | 12 | 15% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 13% |
| Engineering | 5 | 6% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 9 | 11% |
| Unknown | 18 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 February 2015.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Public Health
#878
of 1,900 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#79,631
of 242,351 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Public Health
#22
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,900 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.8. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,351 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.