↓ Skip to main content

Food Omics Validation: Towards Understanding Key Features for Gut Microbiota, Probiotics and Human Health

Overview of attention for article published in Food Analytical Methods, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
Title
Food Omics Validation: Towards Understanding Key Features for Gut Microbiota, Probiotics and Human Health
Published in
Food Analytical Methods, August 2014
DOI 10.1007/s12161-014-9923-6
Authors

María Luján Jiménez-Pranteda, Azahara Pérez-Davó, Mercedes Monteoliva-Sánchez, Alberto Ramos-Cormenzana, Margarita Aguilera

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 6%
Kazakhstan 1 3%
Denmark 1 3%
United States 1 3%
Unknown 29 85%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 18%
Student > Master 6 18%
Lecturer 3 9%
Student > Postgraduate 3 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 9%
Other 13 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 35%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 15%
Unspecified 4 12%
Engineering 3 9%
Other 4 12%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 August 2014.
All research outputs
#7,569,316
of 12,551,235 outputs
Outputs from Food Analytical Methods
#60
of 208 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#91,238
of 193,132 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Food Analytical Methods
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,551,235 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 208 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 193,132 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them