↓ Skip to main content

Efficacy of rebamipide for diclofenac-induced small-intestinal mucosal injuries in healthy subjects: a prospective, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, cross-over study

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Gastroenterology, May 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
102 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
Title
Efficacy of rebamipide for diclofenac-induced small-intestinal mucosal injuries in healthy subjects: a prospective, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, cross-over study
Published in
Journal of Gastroenterology, May 2008
DOI 10.1007/s00535-007-2155-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yasumasa Niwa, Masanao Nakamura, Naoki Ohmiya, Osamu Maeda, Takafumi Ando, Akihiro Itoh, Yoshiki Hirooka, Hidemi Goto

Abstract

Although obscure gastrointestinal bleeding cannot be detected by colonoscopy or upper endoscopy, wireless video capsule endoscopy (VCE) is capable of imaging it. Few data are available on medical therapy for patients with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID)-induced small-intestinal mucosal injuries. The aim of this study was to compare prevention by rebamipide and placebo of NSAID-induced smallintestinal injury in healthy subjects.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 3%
Unknown 28 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 5 17%
Unspecified 4 14%
Researcher 4 14%
Student > Master 4 14%
Other 4 14%
Other 8 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 52%
Unspecified 4 14%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 7%
Psychology 2 7%
Other 4 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 January 2017.
All research outputs
#7,336,783
of 12,220,965 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Gastroenterology
#446
of 711 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#95,521
of 203,320 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Gastroenterology
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,220,965 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 711 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 203,320 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.