RT @3liza: “backfire effect” is the tendency of people invested in erroneous beliefs to react to factual arguments by doubling down instead…
RT @3liza: “backfire effect” is the tendency of people invested in erroneous beliefs to react to factual arguments by doubling down instead…
RT @3liza: “backfire effect” is the tendency of people invested in erroneous beliefs to react to factual arguments by doubling down instead…
RT @3liza: “backfire effect” is the tendency of people invested in erroneous beliefs to react to factual arguments by doubling down instead…
RT @3liza: “backfire effect” is the tendency of people invested in erroneous beliefs to react to factual arguments by doubling down instead…
RT @3liza: “backfire effect” is the tendency of people invested in erroneous beliefs to react to factual arguments by doubling down instead…
Good tweet from a good thread.
RT @3liza: “backfire effect” is the tendency of people invested in erroneous beliefs to react to factual arguments by doubling down instead…
RT @3liza: “backfire effect” is the tendency of people invested in erroneous beliefs to react to factual arguments by doubling down instead…
RT @3liza: “backfire effect” is the tendency of people invested in erroneous beliefs to react to factual arguments by doubling down instead…
RT @3liza: “backfire effect” is the tendency of people invested in erroneous beliefs to react to factual arguments by doubling down instead…
RT @optical_frog: 虚偽の訂正がかえってその虚偽の信念を強めてしまう「裏目効果」を主張した論文: https://t.co/SlqrXv7gbL
RT @optical_frog: 虚偽の訂正がかえってその虚偽の信念を強めてしまう「裏目効果」を主張した論文: https://t.co/SlqrXv7gbL
RT @optical_frog: 虚偽の訂正がかえってその虚偽の信念を強めてしまう「裏目効果」を主張した論文: https://t.co/SlqrXv7gbL
RT @optical_frog: 虚偽の訂正がかえってその虚偽の信念を強めてしまう「裏目効果」を主張した論文: https://t.co/SlqrXv7gbL
虚偽の訂正がかえってその虚偽の信念を強めてしまう「裏目効果」を主張した論文: https://t.co/SlqrXv7gbL
The idea of a backfiring effect gained some currency in academia, I think, as a side result in this article, about factual corrections, and that some corrections seemed to increase misperceptions. https://t.co/QQpkPXZmC8
Some resources from @Permaculture_ME webinar on #foodssytemsnarratives #FoodStoryNE https://t.co/dKf3fXf90e https://t.co/LOyRPqwuYe https://t.co/fLv88JrRUG https://t.co/qBxJ5J5e5H
@DonCheadle It might also have the counter-intuitive effect of strengthening those peoples; beliefs — see e.g., "the backfire effect" https://t.co/OFuopfZ3bx
Yes, and it's irresponsible to recommend repeating falsehoods, even to refute them, since research shows this can backfire. You'd think that if someone's job is information would know about such things. https://t.co/Sq1623xPWY
RT @BrendanNyhan: @JasonReifler Important to realize backfire effects = 2 of 5 studies in 1 article https://t.co/tTZd0u9bfH. That finding g…
RT @BrendanNyhan: @JasonReifler Important to realize backfire effects = 2 of 5 studies in 1 article https://t.co/tTZd0u9bfH. That finding g…
RT @BrendanNyhan: @JasonReifler Important to realize backfire effects = 2 of 5 studies in 1 article https://t.co/tTZd0u9bfH. That finding g…
RT @BrendanNyhan: @JasonReifler Important to realize backfire effects = 2 of 5 studies in 1 article https://t.co/tTZd0u9bfH. That finding g…
RT @BrendanNyhan: @JasonReifler Important to realize backfire effects = 2 of 5 studies in 1 article https://t.co/tTZd0u9bfH. That finding g…
RT @BrendanNyhan: @JasonReifler Important to realize backfire effects = 2 of 5 studies in 1 article https://t.co/tTZd0u9bfH. That finding g…
RT @BrendanNyhan: @JasonReifler Important to realize backfire effects = 2 of 5 studies in 1 article https://t.co/tTZd0u9bfH. That finding g…
RT @BrendanNyhan: @JasonReifler Important to realize backfire effects = 2 of 5 studies in 1 article https://t.co/tTZd0u9bfH. That finding g…
RT @BrendanNyhan: @JasonReifler Important to realize backfire effects = 2 of 5 studies in 1 article https://t.co/tTZd0u9bfH. That finding g…
@JasonReifler Important to realize backfire effects = 2 of 5 studies in 1 article https://t.co/tTZd0u9bfH. That finding got tons of press but not what we or others find in most studies https://t.co/kySLXhkJRA. Doesn't mean easy to misperceptions go away -
@spnbmb @velartrill https://t.co/FOiuNTO9RE The "backfire effect" stuff isn't the main point of this one, it's that the factual beliefs don't change political stance
When Corrections Fail: The Persistence of Political Misperceptions | SpringerLink https://t.co/6aQNzSNZPP
@SaulGood12 @BayleeB79 @RealJamesWoods @POTUS https://t.co/Ck0nhjjflm Please try harder. https://t.co/4x0hKifDm3 Free draft version- https://t.co/MOOUqnJqP4
The @Oatmeal nails the #BackFireEffect #scicomm #politics https://t.co/7vlkXEgoR4 original paper in @PolBehavior https://t.co/GzD03rwenF https://t.co/LHoOyVwCvT
RT @toshi_kuroda: 「政治的なテーマ(イラクに大量破壊兵器があったかどうか、など)について、事実を示した後でも、政治的立場によって、全く効果がなかったり、逆に誤解への確信を強めてしまうケース(バックファイアー効果)が見られた」 https://t.co/CIGu…
「政治的なテーマ(イラクに大量破壊兵器があったかどうか、など)について、事実を示した後でも、政治的立場によって、全く効果がなかったり、逆に誤解への確信を強めてしまうケース(バックファイアー効果)が見られた」 https://t.co/CIGuycX0P7 よんどこ。 https://t.co/YRdr3HLYoF
I'm reading "When Corrections Fail: The Persistence of #PoliticalMisperceptions" on #springerlink https://t.co/uwWnBWENAQ | via @PolBehavior
When Corrections Fail: The Persistence of Political Misperceptions | SpringerLink https://t.co/tV8Kie9I3x
UCLA people-come see @BrendanNyhan today! YRL Room 11360, 3 pm His 2010 paper with Reifler is as important as ever: https://t.co/6NCi4VWvI9
When Corrections Fail: The Persistence of Political Misperceptions https://t.co/f224StjJJK
@BlueInMemphis You should go read up on the "Backfire Effect," https://t.co/dELeJhFluJ
When Corrections Fail: The Persistence of Political Misperceptions https://t.co/Qnce3jPUph
"When Corrections Fail: The Persistence of Political Misperceptions." @BrendanNyhan @JasonReifler 2010 https://t.co/Tg0IHtmMgm @journethics https://t.co/lJ4LjLOL2n
RT @thebestsophist: Dear Zucks, you say this: https://t.co/EO8k2iccEx Peer-review says this: https://t.co/9LMu5vsYfg Science says you are…
RT @thebestsophist: Dear Zucks, you say this: https://t.co/EO8k2iccEx Peer-review says this: https://t.co/9LMu5vsYfg Science says you are…
Dear Zucks, you say this: https://t.co/EO8k2iccEx Peer-review says this: https://t.co/9LMu5vsYfg Science says you are wrong, asshole.
@theitchysweater Vaccines: https://t.co/BCmjAlidFH Politics: https://t.co/nWcSsOHkui
My favorite study of his examines how correcting misperceptions can sometimes have significant backfire effects: https://t.co/TyAYHFmyPz
Correcting misperceptions about flu vaccine does not lead to higher vaccination rates. Study here: http://t.co/LXhLszvttR
The persistence of vaccination myths http://t.co/roCTG15Z2q "'backfire effect' in which corrections actually increase misperceptions"
The persistence of vaccination myths http://t.co/roCTG15Z2q "'backfire effect' in which corrections actually increase misperceptions"
The persistence of vaccination myths http://t.co/roCTG15Z2q "'backfire effect' in which corrections actually increase misperceptions"
@AndreaKitta #grist MT @CaulfieldTim: The persistence of vax myths http://t.co/XPOL7OID7z 'backfire effect'- corrections ++ misperceptions
The persistence of vaccination myths http://t.co/roCTG15Z2q "'backfire effect' in which corrections actually increase misperceptions"
The persistence of vaccination myths http://t.co/roCTG15Z2q "'backfire effect' in which corrections actually increase misperceptions"
starting to think this article is relevant to correcting digra misinfo: http://t.co/AH68SZu7Kq
@ClaytonNall @AWaytz True - I've found evidence in text form is often ineffective (e.g. http://t.co/R0z4hn9dUl http://t.co/FFCSV73vJF)
@pieRRRRH c'est des mécanismes sociopsycho dans des environnements très clivants, pas forcément juste des abrutis :-) http://t.co/tXub3pdjjp
@davidfrum Debunking your data may actually reinforce your conclusions. http://t.co/nyb9LheHFr
@sirtopaz PoliSci scholarship has actually found that facts reinforce false beliefs. People are idiots basically. http://t.co/LcUuwOYP
RT @Springernomics: Los convencidos no cambian de parecer (vía @NYTimes) en inglés http://t.co/MGXrC29T http://t.co/3hONpKeJ
When Corrections Fail: the Persistence of Political Misperceptions. Actual research on correcting lies. Depressing. http://t.co/SisZjrqx
RT @Springernomics: Los convencidos no cambian de parecer (vía @NYTimes) en inglés http://t.co/MGXrC29T http://t.co/3hONpKeJ
Political Behavior article cited in @NYTimes: Campaigns Play Loose With Truth in a Fact-Check Age http://t.co/yPlUPu8J http://t.co/Vscx5R3a
.@darrwest http://t.co/fO9U3Gny suggests it might help!
@ljmeyer3 and peer-reviewed: http://t.co/N7u6v0vE
http://t.co/y6H6qeEG (PDF) Artículo de Nyhan y Reifler que debía a #eleccionesyredes. Corregir rumores puede ser contraproducente
@Tortured_Verse …(http://t.co/wqhbfKao). And the response probably strengthens with how prevalent the idea is. (Pushing it too far? Maybe.)
@DrMatthewSweet @jonronson @mattawarren interesting paper on the potential'backfire effect' of corrections http://t.co/kR8OATu4
RT @thebestsophist: Bibliography for the last tweet: 1. http://t.co/wqhbfKao 2. http://t.co/aprQDA6g 3. http://t.co/s8eXKPLK 4. http://t.co/UjURC6xa
Bibliography for the last tweet: 1. http://t.co/wqhbfKao 2. http://t.co/aprQDA6g 3. http://t.co/s8eXKPLK 4. http://t.co/UjURC6xa
@yuweiquan Two reasons: http://t.co/wyBWnzXb and http://t.co/jYkjaUhS
@sfullick 4/4 …arguments when it matches a belief that is already changing (http://t.co/wyBWnzXb) @davealevine
Via @benpolitico, it appears fact-checking doesn't do much to persuade the public to believe the truth. http://t.co/qjf6T7bO #sigh #tcot #p2
@robinince @tabloidwatch Remember this experiment? http://t.co/l195rYI4 When corrections fail.
@uponnothing Just amazing. I am put in mind of this experiment: http://t.co/l195rYI4 Evidence just entrenches closely-held political beliefs
Makes me think about how taking time w/good data can help quell misperceptions. http://ow.ly/6pdpQ #usingdata @greenebarrett #k12admin
http://t.co/pV4AC8C Great study.
RT @DianeRavitch: Is this why reformers don't listen to evidence? http://t.co/UwJuZQr
RT @DianeRavitch: Is this why reformers don't listen to evidence? http://t.co/UwJuZQr
RT @DianeRavitch: Is this why reformers don't listen to evidence? http://t.co/UwJuZQr
RT @DianeRavitch: Is this why reformers don't listen to evidence? http://t.co/UwJuZQr
Is this why reformers don't listen to evidence? http://t.co/UwJuZQr