| Title |
An enigmatic pygmy dormouse: molecular and morphological evidence for the species taxonomic status of Typhlomys chapensis (Rodentia: Platacanthomyidae)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Zoological Studies, July 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40555-014-0034-2 |
| Authors |
Alexei V Abramov, Alexander E Balakirev, Viatcheslav V Rozhnov |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 13 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 4 | 31% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 15% |
| Other | 1 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 8% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 3 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 38% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 15% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 8% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 8% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 8% |
| Other | 2 | 15% |
| Unknown | 1 | 8% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 July 2014.
All research outputs
#6,408,578
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Zoological Studies
#24
of 198 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,886
of 239,409 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Zoological Studies
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 198 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 239,409 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them