@NicholasChrimes I couldn't select because Japanese GL does not use the term CICO. Noticed difficult FMV -> one best try -> prepare emergency airway device. At that stage, SpO2 is not necessarily deteriorated. Our GL is for experts and elective GA in
RT @yukanes22: Interesting discussion. In the Japanese Society of Anesthesiologist's airway management guideline, we don't say/ define "CIC…
昔にとあるところでDAMの状況に陥って、上司を呼んで状況説明した。 この次の手はどうすると言われて、覚醒を考慮しますって言ったらみんなから笑われたことを結構恨んでる。 https://t.co/STG58S0ZPi
RT @yukanes22: Interesting discussion. In the Japanese Society of Anesthesiologist's airway management guideline, we don't say/ define "CIC…
Interesting discussion. In the Japanese Society of Anesthesiologist's airway management guideline, we don't say/ define "CICV" or "CICO." There is only one algorithm including consideration for restoring a patient's consciousness/breathing. https://t.co/
@alexffuchs @joanaberger3 @sabinenabecker @ElsevierConnect @ptsafetylearn @Med_FOAMed RAG rating is a nice idea Very well presented here The excellent 2014 Japanese guidelines also use this traffic light approach in their algorithm https://t.co/euTleizc
@doctimcook @ANZCA @BJAJournals Yes. JSA guideline has a similar system V1 - V3. I think the 4th grading is of value - something that indicates compromised, but not marginal, ventilation. Room to optimise but not cause for concern. https://t.co/G6KcfXMT