Title |
Uniform Bounds for Strongly Competing Systems: The Optimal Lipschitz Case
|
---|---|
Published in |
Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis, April 2015
|
DOI | 10.1007/s00205-015-0867-9 |
Authors |
Nicola Soave, Alessandro Zilio |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 1 | 50% |
Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 7 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 4 | 57% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 29% |
Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 14% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 4 | 57% |
Mathematics | 3 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 April 2015.
All research outputs
#19,246,640
of 23,852,579 outputs
Outputs from Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis
#419
of 805 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#195,995
of 266,636 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis
#13
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,852,579 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 805 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.6. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 266,636 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.