↓ Skip to main content

High level of venous thromboembolism in critically ill trauma patients despite early and well-driven thromboprophylaxis protocol

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Intensive Care, September 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
62 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
67 Mendeley
Title
High level of venous thromboembolism in critically ill trauma patients despite early and well-driven thromboprophylaxis protocol
Published in
Annals of Intensive Care, September 2017
DOI 10.1186/s13613-017-0315-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

S. R. Hamada, C. Espina, T. Guedj, R. Buaron, A. Harrois, S. Figueiredo, J. Duranteau

Abstract

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is one of the most common preventable causes of in-hospital death in trauma patients surviving their injuries. We assessed the prevalence, incidence and risk factors for deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE) in critically ill trauma patients, in the setting of a mature and early mechanical and pharmacological thromboprophylaxis protocol. This was a prospective observational study on a cohort of patients from a surgical intensive care unit of a university level 1 trauma centre. We enrolled consecutive primary trauma patients expected to be in intensive care for ≥48 h. Thromboprophylaxis was protocol driven. DVT screening was performed by duplex ultrasound of upper and lower extremities within the first 48 h, between 5 and 7 days and then weekly until discharge. We recorded VTE risk factors at baseline and on each examination day. Independent risk factors were analysed using a multivariate logistic regression. In 153 patients with a mean Injury Severity Score of 23 ± 12, the prevalence of VTE was 30.7%, 95 CI [23.7-38.8] (29.4% DVT and 4.6% PE). The incidence was 18%, 95 CI [14-24] patients-week. The median time of apparition of DVT was 6 days [1; 4]. The global protocol compliance was 77.8% with a median time of introduction of the pharmacological prophylaxis of 1 day [1; 2]. We identified four independent risk factors for VTE: central venous catheter (OR 4.39, 95 CI [1.1-29]), medullar injury (OR 5.59, 95 CI [1.7-12.9]), initial systolic arterial pressure <80 mmHg (OR 3.64, 95 CI [1.3-10.8]), and pelvic fracture (OR 3.04, 95 CI [1.2-7.9]). Despite a rigorous, protocol-driven thromboprophylaxis, critically ill trauma patients showed a high incidence of VTE. Further research is needed to tailor pharmacological prophylaxis and balance the risks and benefits.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 67 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 9 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 13%
Student > Master 9 13%
Researcher 7 10%
Student > Bachelor 6 9%
Other 13 19%
Unknown 14 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 42 63%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Sports and Recreations 2 3%
Unspecified 1 1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 18 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 October 2017.
All research outputs
#13,818,773
of 24,135,931 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Intensive Care
#727
of 1,107 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#153,891
of 319,548 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Intensive Care
#17
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,135,931 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,107 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.6. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 319,548 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.