↓ Skip to main content

Comparison of artificial cervical arthroplasty versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for one-level cervical degenerative disc disease: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
Title
Comparison of artificial cervical arthroplasty versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for one-level cervical degenerative disc disease: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
Published in
European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology, July 2014
DOI 10.1007/s00590-014-1510-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jiaquan Luo, Sheng Huang, Min Gong, Xuejun Dai, Manman Gao, Ting Yu, Zhiyu Zhou, Xuenong Zou

Abstract

The aim of the study was to evaluate whether there is a superior clinical effect of artificial cervical arthroplasty compared with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) for the treatment of one-level cervical degenerative disc disease (CDDD).

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 25 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 24%
Other 5 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 12%
Student > Master 3 12%
Unspecified 2 8%
Other 6 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 52%
Unspecified 5 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 8%
Sports and Recreations 1 4%
Social Sciences 1 4%
Other 3 12%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 July 2014.
All research outputs
#11,135,252
of 12,519,471 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology
#272
of 570 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#157,221
of 191,437 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology
#14
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,519,471 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 570 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 191,437 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.