| Title |
Comparison of artificial cervical arthroplasty versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for one-level cervical degenerative disc disease: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology, July 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00590-014-1510-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jiaquan Luo, Sheng Huang, Min Gong, Xuejun Dai, Manman Gao, Ting Yu, Zhiyu Zhou, Xuenong Zou |
| Abstract |
The aim of the study was to evaluate whether there is a superior clinical effect of artificial cervical arthroplasty compared with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) for the treatment of one-level cervical degenerative disc disease (CDDD). |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 53 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 10 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 13% |
| Other | 5 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 8% |
| Other | 9 | 17% |
| Unknown | 14 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 19 | 36% |
| Engineering | 5 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 4% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 4 | 8% |
| Unknown | 17 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 February 2019.
All research outputs
#7,539,404
of 23,666,309 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology
#143
of 898 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#71,472
of 230,128 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology
#1
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,666,309 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 898 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 230,128 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.