↓ Skip to main content

Embodied cognition and STEM learning: overview of a topical collection in CR:PI

Overview of attention for article published in Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, September 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
12 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
78 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
170 Mendeley
Title
Embodied cognition and STEM learning: overview of a topical collection in CR:PI
Published in
Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, September 2017
DOI 10.1186/s41235-017-0071-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Steven M. Weisberg, Nora S. Newcombe

Abstract

Embodied learning approaches emphasize the use of action to support pedagogical goals. A specific version of embodied learning posits an action-to-abstraction transition supported by gesture, sketching, and analogical mapping. These tools seem to have special promise for bolstering learning in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) disciplines, but existing efforts need further theoretical and empirical development. The topical collection in Cognitive Research: Principles includes articles aiming to formalize and test the effectiveness of embodied learning in STEM. The collection provides guideposts, staking out the terrain that should be surveyed before larger-scale efforts are undertaken. This introduction provides a broader context concerning mechanisms that can support embodied learning and make it especially well suited to the STEM disciplines.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 170 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 170 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 39 23%
Researcher 18 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 9%
Student > Master 13 8%
Lecturer 12 7%
Other 26 15%
Unknown 46 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 31 18%
Psychology 23 14%
Computer Science 9 5%
Mathematics 9 5%
Arts and Humanities 9 5%
Other 35 21%
Unknown 54 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 September 2021.
All research outputs
#4,687,146
of 25,483,400 outputs
Outputs from Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications
#157
of 365 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#74,946
of 323,729 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications
#7
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,483,400 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 365 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 43.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 323,729 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.