↓ Skip to main content

A qualitative theory of large games with strategic complementarities

Overview of attention for article published in Economic Theory, September 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
Title
A qualitative theory of large games with strategic complementarities
Published in
Economic Theory, September 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00199-017-1075-7
Authors

Łukasz Balbus, Paweł Dziewulski, Kevin Reffett, Łukasz Woźny

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 9 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 44%
Other 1 11%
Student > Master 1 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 11%
Professor 1 11%
Other 1 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 5 56%
Engineering 2 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 11%
Unspecified 1 11%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 September 2017.
All research outputs
#10,420,594
of 11,753,826 outputs
Outputs from Economic Theory
#157
of 177 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#223,625
of 264,637 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Economic Theory
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 11,753,826 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 177 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,637 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.