↓ Skip to main content

Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes: aims and scope

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes, September 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
Title
Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes: aims and scope
Published in
Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes, September 2017
DOI 10.1186/s41687-017-0009-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dennis Revicki, David Feeny

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 1 33%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 33%
Other 1 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 2 67%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 33%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 September 2017.
All research outputs
#5,411,836
of 21,266,613 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
#81
of 417 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#84,493
of 290,713 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,266,613 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 417 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 290,713 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them