157 followers
But wait there's more: https://t.co/AEKHRRgXKc
15 followers
RT @lutzbornmann: Papers with high novelty ratings by peers receive less citations (in the first 3 years after appearance) than papers with…
589 followers
RT @lutzbornmann: Papers with high novelty ratings by peers receive less citations (in the first 3 years after appearance) than papers with…
1,459 followers
RT @lutzbornmann: Papers with high novelty ratings by peers receive less citations (in the first 3 years after appearance) than papers with…
1,062 followers
RT @lutzbornmann: Papers with high novelty ratings by peers receive less citations (in the first 3 years after appearance) than papers with…
292 followers
RT @lutzbornmann: Papers with high novelty ratings by peers receive less citations (in the first 3 years after appearance) than papers with…
557 followers
RT @lutzbornmann: Papers with high novelty ratings by peers receive less citations (in the first 3 years after appearance) than papers with…
3,728 followers
RT @lutzbornmann: Papers with high novelty ratings by peers receive less citations (in the first 3 years after appearance) than papers with…
583 followers
RT @Lab_Journal: „Our findings demonstrate the urgent need for improvement of scientific peer review.“ https://t.co/meHn1W5fJu
3,539 followers
„Our findings demonstrate the urgent need for improvement of scientific peer review.“ https://t.co/meHn1W5fJu
1,374 followers
RT @lutzbornmann: Papers with high novelty ratings by peers receive less citations (in the first 3 years after appearance) than papers with…
1,589 followers
RT @lutzbornmann: Papers with high novelty ratings by peers receive less citations (in the first 3 years after appearance) than papers with…
14,918 followers
RT @lutzbornmann: Papers with high novelty ratings by peers receive less citations (in the first 3 years after appearance) than papers with…
1,378 followers
RT @lutzbornmann: Papers with high novelty ratings by peers receive less citations (in the first 3 years after appearance) than papers with…
2,294 followers
RT @lutzbornmann: Papers with high novelty ratings by peers receive less citations (in the first 3 years after appearance) than papers with…
11,436 followers
RT @lutzbornmann: Papers with high novelty ratings by peers receive less citations (in the first 3 years after appearance) than papers with…
3,251 followers
RT @lutzbornmann: Papers with high novelty ratings by peers receive less citations (in the first 3 years after appearance) than papers with…
494 followers
RT @lutzbornmann: Papers with high novelty ratings by peers receive less citations (in the first 3 years after appearance) than papers with…
2,101 followers
Papers with high novelty ratings by peers receive less citations (in the first 3 years after appearance) than papers with low ratings https://t.co/UUShelyq2b
184 followers
RT @hbellhaeuser: Peer Review is a lottery - especially for interdisciplinary projects https://t.co/09Yt3shpn8
4,522 followers
RT @hbellhaeuser: Peer Review is a lottery - especially for interdisciplinary projects https://t.co/09Yt3shpn8
1,778 followers
RT @hbellhaeuser: Peer Review is a lottery - especially for interdisciplinary projects https://t.co/09Yt3shpn8
512 followers
Peer Review is a lottery - especially for interdisciplinary projects https://t.co/09Yt3shpn8
540 followers
RT @spiderjens: @mscharkow @Bachl @maltoesermalte Low inter-rater reliability as an obstacle of interdisciplinary research: https://t.co/ek…
3,187 followers
RT @spiderjens: @mscharkow @Bachl @maltoesermalte Low inter-rater reliability as an obstacle of interdisciplinary research: https://t.co/ek…
1,067 followers
@mscharkow @Bachl @maltoesermalte Low inter-rater reliability as an obstacle of interdisciplinary research: https://t.co/ek8m76SiBs
1,483 followers
RT @pash22: Inter-rater reliability and validity of peer reviews in an interdisciplinary field https://t.co/FNtTanHYOq
31,621 followers
Inter-rater reliability and validity of peer reviews in an interdisciplinary field https://t.co/FNtTanHYOq
4,391 followers
RT @biochembelle: Interrater reliability for papers submitted to an interdisciplinary meeting: law agreement even bt same-disc rvwrs https…
1,778 followers
RT @CesarPalmero: 'Our findings demonstrate the urgent need for improvement of scientific peer review' #publishing #science https://t.co/p2…
2,054 followers
RT @Research_Voice: How reliable is #interdisciplinary #peerreview? https://t.co/WWDs44DHF1 #H2020 #research #careers
3,373 followers
RT @Research_Voice: How reliable is #interdisciplinary #peerreview? https://t.co/WWDs44DHF1 #H2020 #research #careers
1,140 followers
RT @Research_Voice: How reliable is #interdisciplinary #peerreview? https://t.co/WWDs44DHF1 #H2020 #research #careers
22,618 followers
How reliable is #interdisciplinary #peerreview? https://t.co/WWDs44DHF1 #H2020 #research #careers
1,567 followers
RT @RetractionWatch: "Our findings demonstrate the urgent need for improvement of scientific peer review." https://t.co/3vacWhxOeb
162 followers
RT @RetractionWatch: "Our findings demonstrate the urgent need for improvement of scientific peer review." https://t.co/3vacWhxOeb
182 followers
RT @schneiderleonid: We need more peer-reviewed papers like that one! https://t.co/1wex0r2cfw
177 followers
RT @schneiderleonid: We need more peer-reviewed papers like that one! https://t.co/1wex0r2cfw
11,764 followers
RT @RetractionWatch: "Our findings demonstrate the urgent need for improvement of scientific peer review." https://t.co/3vacWhxOeb
205 followers
Must read. https://t.co/jfKow1a8Tw
825 followers
RT @RetractionWatch: "Our findings demonstrate the urgent need for improvement of scientific peer review." https://t.co/3vacWhxOeb
2,622 followers
RT @RetractionWatch: "Our findings demonstrate the urgent need for improvement of scientific peer review." https://t.co/3vacWhxOeb
6,554 followers
"high novelty ratings from same-discipline reviewers were negatively associated with citation rate." https://t.co/9AxJ8CNCiB
5,579 followers
RT @RetractionWatch: "Our findings demonstrate the urgent need for improvement of scientific peer review." https://t.co/3vacWhxOeb
1,625 followers
RT @RetractionWatch: "Our findings demonstrate the urgent need for improvement of scientific peer review." https://t.co/3vacWhxOeb
179 followers
RT @RetractionWatch: "Our findings demonstrate the urgent need for improvement of scientific peer review." https://t.co/3vacWhxOeb
2,662 followers
RT @RetractionWatch: "Our findings demonstrate the urgent need for improvement of scientific peer review." https://t.co/3vacWhxOeb
639 followers
RT @RetractionWatch: "Our findings demonstrate the urgent need for improvement of scientific peer review." https://t.co/3vacWhxOeb
365 followers
RT @mattjhodgkinson: "High novelty ratings from same-discipline reviewers were negatively associated with citations" Is novelty a useful co…
1,778 followers
RT @RetractionWatch: "Our findings demonstrate the urgent need for improvement of scientific peer review." https://t.co/3vacWhxOeb
2,138 followers
RT @RetractionWatch: "Our findings demonstrate the urgent need for improvement of scientific peer review." https://t.co/3vacWhxOeb
150 followers
RT @RetractionWatch: "Our findings demonstrate the urgent need for improvement of scientific peer review." https://t.co/3vacWhxOeb
2,338 followers
RT @RetractionWatch: "Our findings demonstrate the urgent need for improvement of scientific peer review." https://t.co/3vacWhxOeb
446 followers
RT @RetractionWatch: "Our findings demonstrate the urgent need for improvement of scientific peer review." https://t.co/3vacWhxOeb
718 followers
RT @RetractionWatch: "Our findings demonstrate the urgent need for improvement of scientific peer review." https://t.co/3vacWhxOeb
3,341 followers
"High novelty ratings from same-discipline reviewers were negatively associated with citations" Is novelty a useful concept in #peerreview? https://t.co/onUb7oJvWb
879 followers
RT @RetractionWatch: "Our findings demonstrate the urgent need for improvement of scientific peer review." https://t.co/3vacWhxOeb
3,831 followers
RT @RetractionWatch: "Our findings demonstrate the urgent need for improvement of scientific peer review." https://t.co/3vacWhxOeb
475 followers
RT @RetractionWatch: "Our findings demonstrate the urgent need for improvement of scientific peer review." https://t.co/3vacWhxOeb
621 followers
RT @RetractionWatch: "Our findings demonstrate the urgent need for improvement of scientific peer review." https://t.co/3vacWhxOeb
2,730 followers
RT @RetractionWatch: "Our findings demonstrate the urgent need for improvement of scientific peer review." https://t.co/3vacWhxOeb
4,660 followers
RT @RetractionWatch: "Our findings demonstrate the urgent need for improvement of scientific peer review." https://t.co/3vacWhxOeb
1,662 followers
Everyone wants to improve peer review and editorial oversight....where is the pressure on publishing houses to pay for the quality demanded? https://t.co/MnGesFyZyH
1,305 followers
RT @RetractionWatch: "Our findings demonstrate the urgent need for improvement of scientific peer review." https://t.co/3vacWhxOeb
31,829 followers
RT @RetractionWatch: "Our findings demonstrate the urgent need for improvement of scientific peer review." https://t.co/3vacWhxOeb
1,410 followers
RT @RetractionWatch: "Our findings demonstrate the urgent need for improvement of scientific peer review." https://t.co/3vacWhxOeb
7,268 followers
RT @RetractionWatch: "Our findings demonstrate the urgent need for improvement of scientific peer review." https://t.co/3vacWhxOeb
91,413 followers
"Our findings demonstrate the urgent need for improvement of scientific peer review." https://t.co/3vacWhxOeb
199 followers
Inter-rater reliability and validity of #peerreview in an interdisciplinary field https://t.co/th1W4EFEkP
2,175 followers
RT @ucress: nice finding: relevance ratings of same-discipline reviewers predict citations of the scientific papers some years later! https…
1,800 followers
Neuer Artikel über #PeerReview und #InterraterReliability @SpringerLink https://t.co/4NuEjfMXiU
943 followers
RT @ucress: our new paper about "Inter-rater reliability and validity of peer reviews in an interdisciplinary field" is out. https://t.co/C…
311 followers
RT @ucress: nice finding: relevance ratings of same-discipline reviewers predict citations of the scientific papers some years later! https…
1,356 followers
RT @ucress: nice finding: relevance ratings of same-discipline reviewers predict citations of the scientific papers some years later! https…
1,183 followers
nice finding: relevance ratings of same-discipline reviewers predict citations of the scientific papers some years later! https://t.co/hBNFQRteVF
1,183 followers
our new paper about "Inter-rater reliability and validity of peer reviews in an interdisciplinary field" is out. https://t.co/CRGgl0gr6D
12,753 followers
RT @GoatsThatStare: Inter-rater reliability and validity of peer reviews in an interdisciplinary field https://t.co/jIcJMwTXpD
6,149 followers
Inter-rater reliability and validity of peer reviews in an interdisciplinary field https://t.co/jIcJMwTXpD