↓ Skip to main content

Edward O. Wilson and the Organicist Tradition

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the History of Biology, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
16 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
Title
Edward O. Wilson and the Organicist Tradition
Published in
Journal of the History of Biology, December 2012
DOI 10.1007/s10739-012-9347-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Abraham H. Gibson

Abstract

Edward O. Wilson's recent decision to abandon kin selection theory has sent shockwaves throughout the biological sciences. Over the past two years, more than a hundred biologists have signed letters protesting his reversal. Making sense of Wilson's decision and the controversy it has spawned requires familiarity with the historical record. This entails not only examining the conditions under which kin selection theory first emerged, but also the organicist tradition against which it rebelled. In similar fashion, one must not only examine Wilson's long career, but also those thinkers who influenced him most, especially his intellectual grandfather, William Morton Wheeler (1865-1937). Wilson belongs to a long line of organicists, biologists whose research highlighted integration and coordination, many of whom struggled over the exact same biological riddles that have long defined Wilson's career. Drawing inspiration (and sometimes ideas) from these intellectual forebears, Wilson is confident that he has finally identified the origin of the social impulse.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 2 6%
Denmark 1 3%
Germany 1 3%
Unknown 28 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 22%
Student > Bachelor 5 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 13%
Professor 3 9%
Other 2 6%
Other 7 22%
Unknown 4 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 44%
Philosophy 2 6%
Social Sciences 2 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 6%
Computer Science 2 6%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 7 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 December 2021.
All research outputs
#3,374,317
of 24,228,883 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the History of Biology
#58
of 506 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,428
of 285,814 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the History of Biology
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,228,883 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 506 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 285,814 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.