↓ Skip to main content

The use of a three-dimensional endoscope for different skull base tumors: results of a preliminary extended endonasal surgical series

Overview of attention for article published in Acta Neurochirurgica, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
63 Mendeley
Title
The use of a three-dimensional endoscope for different skull base tumors: results of a preliminary extended endonasal surgical series
Published in
Acta Neurochirurgica, June 2016
DOI 10.1007/s00701-016-2847-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Giuseppe Catapano, Matteo de Notaris, Domenico Di Maria, Luis Alonso Fernandez, Giuseppe Di Nuzzo, Vincenzo Seneca, Giuseppina Iorio, Iacopo Dallan

Abstract

The evolution of skull base surgery over the past decade has been influenced by advancement in visualization technology. Recently, as a result of such improvements, three-dimensional (3-D) scopes have been widely used during endoscopic endonasal approaches. In the present study, we describe the use of 3-D stereoscopic endoscope for the treatment of a variety of skull base lesions. From January 2010 to June 2015, a 3-D endoscopic endonasal approach (4 and 4.9 mm, 0°, and 30° rigid endoscopes) was performed in 70 patients with the following lesions: 42 large extrasellar pituitary macroadenomas, seven tuberculum sellae meningiomas, seven clivus chordomas, five craniopharyngiomas, three fibrous dysplasia of the clivus, three sinonasal malignancies, one orbital lymphangioma, one trigeminal neurinoma, one primary suprasellar lymphoma. Total tumor removal was obtained in 50 patients (71.4 %) while in 14 (20 %), subtotal removal was possible in six (8.6 %) only partial removal was achieved. Overall complications included diabetes insipidus in eight patients (11.4 %), hypopituitarism in seven patients (10 %), CSF leak in five patients (7.1 %), cranial nerve injury in two patients (2.8 %), panhypopituitarism in two patients (2.8 %), meningitis in one (1.4 %) and one postoperative central retinal artery occlusion (1.4 %). There was no mortality in the series. The mean follow-up time was 39 months (range, 6-72 months). In our experience, the 3-D endoscope represents a critical development in visualization, thus enabling improved hand-eye coordination and depth perception, which are mandatory for the management of complex intradural neurovascular structures during tumor removal surgery.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 63 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 7 11%
Student > Postgraduate 7 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 10%
Researcher 6 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 10%
Other 15 24%
Unknown 16 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 27 43%
Neuroscience 5 8%
Engineering 2 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Computer Science 1 2%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 23 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 September 2017.
All research outputs
#18,571,001
of 23,001,641 outputs
Outputs from Acta Neurochirurgica
#1,544
of 1,933 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#256,944
of 341,088 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Neurochirurgica
#13
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,001,641 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,933 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,088 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.