| Title |
Study of inter- and intra-observer reproducibility in the interpretation of [18F]choline PET/CT examinations in patients suffering from biochemically recurrent prostate cancer following curative treatment
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
EJNMMI Research, May 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13550-014-0025-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Clothilde Pegard, Céline Gallazzini-Crépin, Joris Giai, Julien Dubreuil, Cécile Caoduro, Marie-Dominique Desruet, Julie Roux, Alex Calizzano, Daniel Fagret, Chloé Lamesa, Hatem Boulahdour, Jean-Philippe Vuillez |
| Abstract |
The aim of this study was to investigate the reproducibility of intra- and inter-observer interpretation of [(18)F]choline positron emission tomography/computed tomography examinations in patients suffering from biochemically recurrent prostate cancer following curative treatment. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sweden | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 23 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 4 | 17% |
| Researcher | 4 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 13% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 13% |
| Other | 3 | 13% |
| Unknown | 4 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 54% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 8% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 4% |
| Sports and Recreations | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 5 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 July 2014.
All research outputs
#20,232,430
of 22,758,248 outputs
Outputs from EJNMMI Research
#384
of 555 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#192,048
of 226,628 outputs
Outputs of similar age from EJNMMI Research
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,758,248 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 555 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 226,628 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.