@DannyHatcher @DanAbrahams77 Often misunderstood through older computational perspectives of the brain https://t.co/SCl86ml5GC
@bigpicsoccer @coachsabre @DCGreyMattersUK No issues with that and traditional predictive models: https://t.co/7J7fViArAT
すごく気になってた話 ①https://t.co/rT8StjH1x2 ②https://t.co/ITyp0hqCfZ #unreadPaper
@AsafKlaf @Mark_Solms @edwinderaaij @CogsAndy Wrong question in my opinion as WHO suggests some homunculus and will probably lead to anthropomorphizing...although 🤔I have no objections to taking an intentional stance (https://t.co/lml6hq2ybv) https://t.co/
@jacricks Good read to start with here, much better than fluffy social media post 😅😂 https://t.co/bLP6kZ4Vwo
@getnormality @RokoMijic it's definitely more than just a casual throw-off (although to be fair it is also not fully settled consensus either) but like there's a lot of gears-level neuroscience going on, e.g. this comparison between motor cortex & vi
Predictions not commands: active inference in the motor system https://t.co/QEcJkDrFoi
3/ Such decisions would involve elaborative cognition and value-based selection, with the most relevant contrasts/difference-makers likely evolving on levels associated with integrated conscious personhood and selves as "centers of narrative gravity." htt
1/ While circular causation with looping effects make it difficult to disentangle top-down vs. bottom-up influences, seems like the canonical account would state that action selection is always generated as predictions, and hence would come from the top.
6/It seems that much of multiple realizability and insensitivity to particular implementations could derive from the nature of hierarchical control, where multiple lower-level processes could realize higher level predictions/commands/attractors. https://t.
3/In predictive processing, this could be understood as accumulation of "model evidence" for a particular proprioceptive pose, to be enactively realized, as a kind of inference. https://t.co/znVM45n4r7
@gpt9000 @NeuroYogacara An unintentional reductio: https://t.co/VmoNYnuDfA
@manoliskellis also compellingly suggests that similar principles may help to explain the emergence of motor control over the course of development, which provides a generalized evolutionary account of perceptual-control-theory-type models. https://t.co/z
@NoahGuzman14 https://t.co/2tWQ5I704G https://t.co/dSbo8hLwrF Regarding the anatomical architecture and FEP, which rests on top-down/bottom-up incongruity. The anatomy of the brain and nerves inply precisely more top-down than botton-up (particularly in
@Jeff_Weiler this is really cool -- without having read the paper (yet), it reminds me of the argument (see below for paper) that neurons in brain and even in spinal cord may encode proprioceptive goal states (rather than motor commands). https://t.co/2s9U
Predictions not commands: active inference in the motor system. https://t.co/8MfKGYTH3F