New $$\varepsilon$$ ε -Regularity Criteria of Suitable Weak Solutions of the 3D Navier–Stokes Equations at One Scale

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Nonlinear Science, June 2019

• Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
• Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

4 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

mendeley
1 Mendeley
Title New $$\varepsilon$$ ε -Regularity Criteria of Suitable Weak Solutions of the 3D Navier–Stokes Equations at One Scale Journal of Nonlinear Science, June 2019 10.1007/s00332-019-09555-2 Cheng He, Yanqing Wang, Daoguo Zhou

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Mathematics 1 100%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 September 2017.
All research outputs
#8,424,883
of 13,445,494 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Nonlinear Science
#204,341
of 526,086 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#154,634
of 267,263 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Nonlinear Science
#11,122
of 21,844 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,445,494 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 526,086 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 267,263 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21,844 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.