↓ Skip to main content

New $$\varepsilon $$-Regularity Criteria of Suitable Weak Solutions of the 3D Navier–Stokes Equations at One Scale

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Nonlinear Science, June 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
Title
New $$\varepsilon $$-Regularity Criteria of Suitable Weak Solutions of the 3D Navier–Stokes Equations at One Scale
Published in
Journal of Nonlinear Science, June 2019
DOI 10.1007/s00332-019-09555-2
Authors

Cheng He, Yanqing Wang, Daoguo Zhou

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Mathematics 1 100%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 September 2017.
All research outputs
#16,069,695
of 23,852,579 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Nonlinear Science
#98
of 363 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#219,692
of 355,048 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Nonlinear Science
#4
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,852,579 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 363 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 355,048 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.