↓ Skip to main content

Testing the usefulness of hydrogen and compound-specific stable isotope analyses in seabird feathers: a case study in two sympatric Antarctic storm-petrels

Overview of attention for article published in Marine Biology, September 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
Title
Testing the usefulness of hydrogen and compound-specific stable isotope analyses in seabird feathers: a case study in two sympatric Antarctic storm-petrels
Published in
Marine Biology, September 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00227-017-3224-8
Authors

Petra Quillfeldt, Simon Thorn, Benjamin Richter, Marcela Nabte, Nestor Coria, Juan F. Masello, Melanie Massaro, Verónica C. Neves, Marcela Libertelli

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 37 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 27%
Researcher 9 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 22%
Student > Bachelor 3 8%
Professor 2 5%
Other 5 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 25 68%
Environmental Science 5 14%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 8%
Unspecified 2 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Other 1 3%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 September 2017.
All research outputs
#2,109,471
of 12,367,143 outputs
Outputs from Marine Biology
#384
of 2,041 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#65,349
of 271,198 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Marine Biology
#15
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,367,143 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,041 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 271,198 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.