↓ Skip to main content

Effect of body size and gender in overarm throwing performance

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Applied Physiology, November 2003
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
83 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
137 Mendeley
Title
Effect of body size and gender in overarm throwing performance
Published in
European Journal of Applied Physiology, November 2003
DOI 10.1007/s00421-003-1019-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Roland van den Tillaar, Gertjan Ettema

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between maximum isometric strength, anthropometry and maximum velocity in overarm throwing for male and female experienced handball players. Twenty male and 20 female handball players were tested. The mean ball velocity was 23.2 m s(-1) and 19.1 m s(-1) for male and female handball players, respectively. For males and females, similar correlations were found between maximal isometric strength and throwing velocity (men, r=0.43, P=0.056; women, r=0.49, P=0.027). Univariate analysis of variance between isometric strength and throwing velocity for men and women showed no significant effect of gender (F(2,36)=0.116, P=0.89). Body size had a strong positive effect on the throwing performance and isometric strength. Throwing velocity appeared to be affected by gender when size was expressed by mass or height (P<0.001). However, this dependence was completely explained by size differences when expressed as fat-free body mass (FFM). For strength, no gender effect was found at all, i.e. all gender differences were explained by size differences, irrespective on how this was expressed. The finding that strength and velocity show a gender independent relationship strengthens the notion that gender difference is based on difference in muscle bulk. We conclude that FFM, as an approximation for skeletal muscle mass, is the best measure to express body size when related to physical performance.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 137 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Qatar 1 <1%
Unknown 134 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 18%
Student > Bachelor 19 14%
Student > Master 18 13%
Researcher 12 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 11 8%
Other 31 23%
Unknown 21 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 60 44%
Medicine and Dentistry 15 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 4%
Psychology 5 4%
Other 17 12%
Unknown 25 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 March 2020.
All research outputs
#2,982,618
of 25,368,786 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Applied Physiology
#916
of 4,345 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,725
of 142,385 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Applied Physiology
#3
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,368,786 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,345 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 142,385 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.