↓ Skip to main content

Governing fisheries through the critical decade: the role and utility of polycentric systems

Overview of attention for article published in Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries, August 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
17 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
86 Mendeley
Title
Governing fisheries through the critical decade: the role and utility of polycentric systems
Published in
Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries, August 2017
DOI 10.1007/s11160-017-9495-9
Authors

C. Cvitanovic, A. J. Hobday, J. McDonald, E. I. Van Putten, K. L. Nash

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 86 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 19 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 17%
Student > Master 12 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 8%
Student > Bachelor 4 5%
Other 6 7%
Unknown 23 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 23 27%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 15%
Social Sciences 8 9%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 5 6%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 2%
Other 7 8%
Unknown 28 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 February 2018.
All research outputs
#3,469,725
of 25,069,047 outputs
Outputs from Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries
#188
of 628 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,885
of 321,750 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries
#8
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,069,047 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 628 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 321,750 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.