↓ Skip to main content

Governing fisheries through the critical decade: the role and utility of polycentric systems

Overview of attention for article published in Reviews in Fish Biology & Fisheries, August 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#25 of 252)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
17 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
Title
Governing fisheries through the critical decade: the role and utility of polycentric systems
Published in
Reviews in Fish Biology & Fisheries, August 2017
DOI 10.1007/s11160-017-9495-9
Authors

C. Cvitanovic, A. J. Hobday, J. McDonald, E. I. Van Putten, K. L. Nash

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 50%
Researcher 2 33%
Student > Master 1 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 2 33%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 33%
Psychology 2 33%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 September 2017.
All research outputs
#701,528
of 8,508,684 outputs
Outputs from Reviews in Fish Biology & Fisheries
#25
of 252 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,561
of 202,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Reviews in Fish Biology & Fisheries
#2
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 8,508,684 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 252 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 202,554 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.