↓ Skip to main content

Application of iPS Cells in Dental Bioengineering and Beyond

Overview of attention for article published in Stem Cell Reviews, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
Title
Application of iPS Cells in Dental Bioengineering and Beyond
Published in
Stem Cell Reviews, June 2014
DOI 10.1007/s12015-014-9531-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Pengfei Liu, Yanmei Zhang, Shubin Chen, Jinglei Cai, Duanqing Pei

Abstract

The stem-cell-based tissue-engineering approaches are widely applied in establishing functional organs and tissues for regenerative medicine. Successful generation of induced pluripotent stem cells (iPS cells) and rapid progress of related technical platform provide great promise in the development of regenerative medicine, including organ regeneration. We have previously reported that iPS cells could be an appealing stem cells source contributing to tooth regeneration. In the present paper, we mainly review the application of iPS technology in dental bioengineering and discuss the challenges for iPS cells in the whole tooth regeneration.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 5%
Malaysia 1 5%
Colombia 1 5%
Unknown 19 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 23%
Unspecified 3 14%
Student > Postgraduate 3 14%
Student > Master 3 14%
Other 3 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 45%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 32%
Unspecified 3 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 5%
Engineering 1 5%
Other 0 0%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 June 2014.
All research outputs
#11,576,982
of 13,028,310 outputs
Outputs from Stem Cell Reviews
#439
of 483 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#154,133
of 187,678 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Stem Cell Reviews
#23
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,028,310 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 483 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 187,678 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.