↓ Skip to main content

Dysglycaemia in the critically ill and the interaction of chronic and acute glycaemia with mortality

Overview of attention for article published in Intensive Care Medicine, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
91 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
71 Mendeley
Title
Dysglycaemia in the critically ill and the interaction of chronic and acute glycaemia with mortality
Published in
Intensive Care Medicine, April 2014
DOI 10.1007/s00134-014-3287-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mark P. Plummer, Rinaldo Bellomo, Caroline E. Cousins, Christopher E. Annink, Krishnaswamy Sundararajan, Benjamin A. J. Reddi, John P. Raj, Marianne J. Chapman, Michael Horowitz, Adam M. Deane

Abstract

Hyperglycaemia is common in the critically ill. The objectives of this study were to determine the prevalence of critical illness-associated hyperglycaemia (CIAH) and recognised and unrecognised diabetes in the critically ill as well as to evaluate the impact of premorbid glycaemia on the association between acute hyperglycaemia and mortality.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 4%
Brazil 2 3%
Netherlands 1 1%
Colombia 1 1%
Unknown 64 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 18%
Student > Master 12 17%
Other 9 13%
Researcher 9 13%
Student > Postgraduate 7 10%
Other 17 24%
Unknown 4 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 50 70%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 3%
Social Sciences 2 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 1%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 8 11%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 June 2014.
All research outputs
#2,965,971
of 3,927,047 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#856
of 1,048 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#73,482
of 97,824 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#33
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 3,927,047 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,048 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 97,824 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.