Title |
The influence of deprivation on suicide mortality in urban and rural Queensland: an ecological analysis
|
---|---|
Published in |
Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, June 2014
|
DOI | 10.1007/s00127-014-0905-1 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Chi-kin Law, Anne-Marie Snider, Diego De Leo |
Abstract |
A trend of higher suicide rates in rural and remote areas as well as areas with low socioeconomic status has been shown in previous research. Little is known whether the influence of social deprivation on suicide differs between urban and rural areas. This investigation aims to examine how social deprivation influences suicide mortality and to identify which related factors of deprivation have a higher potential to reduce suicide risk in urban and rural Queensland, Australia. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 2% |
India | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 82 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 14 | 16% |
Student > Master | 14 | 16% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 7 | 8% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 6% |
Other | 15 | 18% |
Unknown | 21 | 25% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Social Sciences | 19 | 22% |
Psychology | 13 | 15% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 13% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 6% |
Computer Science | 2 | 2% |
Other | 8 | 9% |
Unknown | 27 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 June 2014.
All research outputs
#16,031,680
of 23,794,258 outputs
Outputs from Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
#2,023
of 2,534 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#136,018
of 230,267 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
#30
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,794,258 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,534 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 230,267 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.