Title |
Social networks of health care providers and patients in cardiovascular risk management: a study protocol
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Health Services Research, June 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/1472-6963-14-265 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Naomi Heijmans, Jan van Lieshout, Michel Wensing |
Abstract |
In recent years, preventive and clinical interventions for cardiovascular risk management have been implemented widely in primary care in the Netherlands. Although this has enhanced quality and outcomes of cardiovascular risk management, further improvement remains possible. In the planned observational study, we aim to examine the role of social networks of healthcare providers and patients in quality and outcomes of cardiovascular risk management. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Colombia | 1 | 17% |
Germany | 1 | 17% |
Austria | 1 | 17% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 17% |
Unknown | 2 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 50% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 33% |
Scientists | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 47 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 19% |
Student > Master | 8 | 17% |
Student > Bachelor | 7 | 15% |
Researcher | 5 | 11% |
Other | 4 | 9% |
Other | 4 | 9% |
Unknown | 10 | 21% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Social Sciences | 9 | 19% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 13% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 9% |
Computer Science | 3 | 6% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 6% |
Other | 9 | 19% |
Unknown | 13 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 May 2016.
All research outputs
#7,284,512
of 23,881,329 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#3,538
of 7,949 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,581
of 230,779 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#52
of 128 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,881,329 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,949 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 230,779 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 128 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.