↓ Skip to main content

Collecting near mature and immature orchid seeds for ex situ conservation: ‘in vitro collecting’ as a case study

Overview of attention for article published in Botanical Studies, August 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#43 of 188)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
59 Mendeley
Title
Collecting near mature and immature orchid seeds for ex situ conservation: ‘in vitro collecting’ as a case study
Published in
Botanical Studies, August 2017
DOI 10.1186/s40529-017-0187-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jonathan P. Kendon, Landy Rajaovelona, Helen Sandford, Rui Fang, Jake Bell, Viswambharan Sarasan

Abstract

Lack of phenological information and efficient collecting methods are considered impediments for orchid seed collecting. This leads to opportunistic collecting as part of general seed collecting schedules that may last few weeks especially in remote areas. The study explored the feasibility of collecting near mature and immature seeds to support conservation action plans. Mature, near mature and immature seeds of orchids were collected from the wild in the Central Highlands of Madagascar (CHM). Seed capsules were collected in sterile culture medium in the wild, to prevent deterioration of seeds inside the capsule after collecting, later to be cultured under laboratory conditions. Seed capsules collected by the in vitro collecting (IVC) method were kept in very good condition for up to 4 weeks before germination under in vitro conditions. Significantly faster and higher germination rate (p < 0.001) than mature seeds was observed in a number of taxa collected during a 3 year-long study. In some taxa even immature seeds, with no apparent sign of testa covering the embryo, germinated following IVC where mature seeds failed to germinate. We propose that IVC method has potential to complement conventional seed collecting by increasing the germplasm that can be used in integrated conservation action plans. Improvements can be made in developing collections for taxa from biodiversity hotspots and remote areas where collecting requires considerable resources. This method can further be used on a wider selection of plants from different geographic areas and on embryo rescue programmes for economically important plants.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 59 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 14%
Student > Bachelor 7 12%
Researcher 5 8%
Lecturer 4 7%
Other 9 15%
Unknown 16 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 26 44%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 10%
Environmental Science 4 7%
Psychology 2 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 18 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 August 2017.
All research outputs
#7,716,088
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Botanical Studies
#43
of 188 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#112,406
of 327,568 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Botanical Studies
#4
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 188 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,568 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.