↓ Skip to main content

Big data and disaster management: a systematic review and agenda for future research

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Operations Research, August 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
239 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
512 Mendeley
Title
Big data and disaster management: a systematic review and agenda for future research
Published in
Annals of Operations Research, August 2017
DOI 10.1007/s10479-017-2584-2
Authors

Shahriar Akter, Samuel Fosso Wamba

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 512 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 512 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 80 16%
Student > Master 76 15%
Researcher 34 7%
Student > Bachelor 29 6%
Lecturer 28 5%
Other 90 18%
Unknown 175 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 68 13%
Business, Management and Accounting 59 12%
Engineering 56 11%
Social Sciences 39 8%
Environmental Science 17 3%
Other 74 14%
Unknown 199 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 January 2020.
All research outputs
#15,528,733
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Operations Research
#399
of 906 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#168,735
of 328,338 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Operations Research
#6
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 906 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,338 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.