↓ Skip to main content

Phytoremediation Potential of Aquatic Macrophyte, Azolla

Overview of attention for article published in Ambio, June 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
228 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
363 Mendeley
Title
Phytoremediation Potential of Aquatic Macrophyte, Azolla
Published in
Ambio, June 2011
DOI 10.1007/s13280-011-0159-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anjuli Sood, Perm L. Uniyal, Radha Prasanna, Amrik S. Ahluwalia

Abstract

Aquatic macrophytes play an important role in the structural and functional aspects of aquatic ecosystems by altering water movement regimes, providing shelter to fish and aquatic invertebrates, serving as a food source, and altering water quality by regulating oxygen balance, nutrient cycles, and accumulating heavy metals. The ability to hyperaccumulate heavy metals makes them interesting research candidates, especially for the treatment of industrial effluents and sewage waste water. The use of aquatic macrophytes, such as Azolla with hyper accumulating ability is known to be an environmentally friendly option to restore polluted aquatic resources. The present review highlights the phytoaccumulation potential of macrophytes with emphasis on utilization of Azolla as a promising candidate for phytoremediation. The impact of uptake of heavy metals on morphology and metabolic processes of Azolla has also been discussed for a better understanding and utilization of this symbiotic association in the field of phytoremediation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 363 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 2 <1%
Philippines 1 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 358 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 56 15%
Student > Bachelor 52 14%
Student > Master 46 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 22 6%
Researcher 20 6%
Other 48 13%
Unknown 119 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 86 24%
Environmental Science 62 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 21 6%
Engineering 21 6%
Chemistry 6 2%
Other 37 10%
Unknown 130 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 April 2017.
All research outputs
#4,562,462
of 25,257,066 outputs
Outputs from Ambio
#760
of 1,784 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,591
of 120,810 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ambio
#2
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,257,066 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,784 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 120,810 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.