Title |
Initial Data for Numerical Relativity
|
---|---|
Published in |
Living Reviews in Relativity, November 2000
|
DOI | 10.12942/lrr-2000-5 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Gregory B. Cook |
Abstract |
Initial data are the starting point for any numerical simulation. In the case of numerical relativity, Einstein's equations constrain our choices of these initial data. We will examine several of the formalisms used for specifying Cauchy initial data in the 3 + 1 decomposition of Einstein's equations. We will then explore how these formalisms have been used in constructing initial data for spacetimes containing black holes and neutron stars. In the topics discussed, emphasis is placed on those issues that are important for obtaining astrophysically realistic initial data for compact binary coalescence. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 94 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 3 | 3% |
Germany | 2 | 2% |
United States | 2 | 2% |
India | 1 | 1% |
Ireland | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 85 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 32 | 34% |
Researcher | 20 | 21% |
Professor | 8 | 9% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 6% |
Other | 5 | 5% |
Other | 15 | 16% |
Unknown | 8 | 9% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Physics and Astronomy | 70 | 74% |
Mathematics | 7 | 7% |
Computer Science | 3 | 3% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 1% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 1% |
Other | 2 | 2% |
Unknown | 10 | 11% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 January 2023.
All research outputs
#7,348,372
of 25,378,162 outputs
Outputs from Living Reviews in Relativity
#107
of 150 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,557
of 40,940 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Living Reviews in Relativity
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,378,162 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 150 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.9. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 40,940 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them