RT @rkomesidou: There're 3 types of outcomes in #ImpSci. Client outcomes refer to symptomatology, function, & satisfaction. Service outcome…
RT @Bigideaspsych: “Distinguishing implementation effectiveness from treatment effectiveness is critical for transporting interventions fro…
RT @rkomesidou: There're 3 types of outcomes in #ImpSci. Client outcomes refer to symptomatology, function, & satisfaction. Service outcome…
RT @rkomesidou: There're 3 types of outcomes in #ImpSci. Client outcomes refer to symptomatology, function, & satisfaction. Service outcome…
RT @rkomesidou: There're 3 types of outcomes in #ImpSci. Client outcomes refer to symptomatology, function, & satisfaction. Service outcome…
RT @Bigideaspsych: “Distinguishing implementation effectiveness from treatment effectiveness is critical for transporting interventions fro…
“Distinguishing implementation effectiveness from treatment effectiveness is critical for transporting interventions from laboratory settings to community health and mental health venues.”
RT @rkomesidou: There're 3 types of outcomes in #ImpSci. Client outcomes refer to symptomatology, function, & satisfaction. Service outcome…
There're 3 types of outcomes in #ImpSci. Client outcomes refer to symptomatology, function, & satisfaction. Service outcomes refer to domains of quality care. Implementation outcomes refer to effects of deliberate & purposive actions to implement p
@EkpProctor outlines research that advances a new concept of “implementation outcomes” distinct from service and clinical outcomes https://t.co/V7LlCAPTp8 #ImpSci23 @ImpSciUW https://t.co/uewd2PuA1L
@BenRidenJMU Yup! We're partial to the seminal #impsci guidance from @enola_proctor and colleagues for defining implementation outcomes https://t.co/voX5M8MKOc
実装アウトカム 新しい治療、プラクティス、サービスを実装するための意図的な行動の効果を測定する指標。 Proctorらは、受容性、実施可能性、採用、浸透度、適切性、費用、忠実度、持続可能性の8つの実装アウトカムを提唱。 https://t.co/VvMfGGCWP1
RT @StephWheelerUNC: I'll go first. I was a 1st-yr @mtdirc fellow & heard @EkpProctor talking about the "flow" of #impsci research & I fina…
評価フレームワーク: 実装の成功を判断するため、評価できる実装の指標を提示。 RE-AIM、PRECEDE-PROCEEDは公衆衛生から出てきたもの。Proctorは、8つの実装アウトカムを提示。これまでの4つの分類であげたTMFも評価に用いることが可能。 実装アウトカムフレームワーク https://t.co/VvMfGGCWP1
Understanding the distinction between intervention failure & implementation failure: Proctor et al 2011 Outcomes for Implementation Research: Conceptual Distinctions, Measurement Challenges, and Research Agenda via @dr_know https://t.co/hhvHkxgQYz
@KyleeRucinski Not ethics concept! Implementation science concept! And I'm not saying you shouldn't use adherence, but it can potentially be confusing to use the same term for both parties and one is potentially a predictor or moderator/mediator of the oth
@QueenBeeChange @JSchleiderPhD Proctor et al. note that, “the foremost challenge [to disseminating EBPs] may be measuring implementation fidelity quickly and efficiently," which our team at Lyssn are day-in-day-out working to address. https://t.co/4pCFrry
RT @KLCampbellPhD: Recommended models from experts in implementation, like @sarah_ns_phd are so helpful to others in the field trying to le…
Recommended models from experts in implementation, like @sarah_ns_phd are so helpful to others in the field trying to learn how to do this work effectively #ExOnc_AMA
@_hannahschulte @_sarahweller @CEPL_UBC I really like Enola Proctor's Implementation Outcomes Framework as a starting point - but it will also depend on your research question https://t.co/2I7khcfCgp #ExOnc_AMA https://t.co/xICB1xudPs
Outcomes for Implementation Research: Conceptual Distinctions, Measurement Challenges, & Research Agenda (Proctor 2010) https://t.co/I4gtz9PMbv #impsci
thats an interesting concept and a nice paper! Will have to look at that more closely in regards to evaluation...i.e. its easy to look to clinical/patient outcomes, but JBI has FAME at the heart of EBHC which segways nicely in to a broader construct for t
@CraigSL01 @trifectaRN @JBI_EI @ACooperSF @JBIEBHC Thanks Craig and happy EBHC day from UK. 'Practical' makes me think of @enola_proctor outcomes, in relation to what is being impl'ed + the strategy. To be practical, both need to be acceptable; appropriate
We also assessed each service based on the implementation research framework. [4/8] https://t.co/pUvpLbQabz
@AskeladdenTX @thesailingdays @WesPegden This is the public health version of that book. It is implementation bible written by Enola Proctor. https://t.co/2pYRhA16Ze But I should have just told Dr. Proctor that if you threatened and shamed people enough
Outcomes for implementation research: conceptual distinctions, measurement challenges, and research agenda https://t.co/rL01PC7lEo
@EddieIglesia @EpiEllie @byron_powell @bjweiner Thanks for thinking of me! @EkpProctor’s pp on implementation outcomes may be useful in helping you think about whether you’re interested in a program’s implementation and/or its effect on service outcomes/pr
Outcomes for Implementation Research: Conceptual Distinctions, Measurement Challenges, and Research Agenda https://t.co/OGxjN1y5vT
RT @KTB_PhD: Yes! Implementation outcomes are a necessity if we are going to move the #ExerciseOncology field forward. https://t.co/C8yyG7w…
Outcomes for implementation is a big gap in the health services https://t.co/PaTJ5waesx
RT @sarah_ns_phd: @ExOncTc @nccmt 9/10 Finally: Evaluate and report on traditional patient level-outcomes (PA, QoL, fitness etc) but also💥i…
Yes! Implementation outcomes are a necessity if we are going to move the #ExerciseOncology field forward.
RT @sarah_ns_phd: @ExOncTc @nccmt 9/10 Finally: Evaluate and report on traditional patient level-outcomes (PA, QoL, fitness etc) but also💥i…
@ExOncTc @nccmt 9/10 Finally: Evaluate and report on traditional patient level-outcomes (PA, QoL, fitness etc) but also💥implementation💥outcomes (see https://t.co/gwkyIhITA1) to move the field forward We need to know the why and how! The @RE_AIM framework
RT @BaumannAna: No need to say that then I walk my way through @enola_proctor et al framework https://t.co/UyLKjJOMk4 4/
No need to say that then I walk my way through @enola_proctor et al framework https://t.co/UyLKjJOMk4 4/
You guys! ❤️ya!!! Your Easter Egg stands on its own and will be super influential itself. @IRIfellowship stars ⭐️ I
Sadly they rejected our table of contents image of @enola_proctor I don't think they understood our little easter egg as the paper riffs on her super influential 2011 paper https://t.co/aFHkcCCPQD
RT @mcpoliti: @HTGoldPhD asks us to consider the level of analysis when evaluating the #implementation of evidence-based interventions, in…
RT @mcpoliti: @HTGoldPhD asks us to consider the level of analysis when evaluating the #implementation of evidence-based interventions, in…
@HTGoldPhD asks us to consider the level of analysis when evaluating the #implementation of evidence-based interventions, in the @NCI_ImplSci fireside chat. great advice, and relates to @enola_proctor 's work and framework on implementation outcomes https:
Another one for the #ImplementReadingList via @EmmaJ_Adams about how to conceptualize and evaluate successful implementation @ISBNPA @EkpProctor https://t.co/vI9Hm17ow4
@ISBNPA_IS @femkevnvn @CathieSherr @ElaineMurtagh Also, this paper from @EkpProctor et al, 2011 https://t.co/auwvQ5kNA6
RT @UWICTR_DandI: #ICTR_DI18 #ImpSci has several types of outcomes that go beyond the health behavior or metric used for effectiveness - vi…
#ICTR_DI18 #ImpSci has several types of outcomes that go beyond the health behavior or metric used for effectiveness - via @RussGlasgow https://t.co/9bbPd5ahUj https://t.co/xuHdjvIJ7s
RT @EvansCIIS: CIIS pilot grant apps are due Friday. Looking forward to seeing which #impsci outcomes are being targeted. Here’s a great re…
RT @EvansCIIS: CIIS pilot grant apps are due Friday. Looking forward to seeing which #impsci outcomes are being targeted. Here’s a great re…
CIIS pilot grant apps are due Friday. Looking forward to seeing which #impsci outcomes are being targeted. Here’s a great resource on specifying your outcomes https://t.co/yvMHoXae2a
@amcunningham @techcarecymru @NWISupdates @lily_dart Though a quick bit or googling has lead me to: https://t.co/sij8gO6AcM and some of the linked references seem to have explored this concept though not directly related to shared records thought a lot app
RT @EvansCIIS: This month we are focusing on #impsci outcomes. What are #impsci specific outcomes? Learn more: https://t.co/yvMHoXae2a
RT @EvansCIIS: This month we are focusing on #impsci outcomes. What are #impsci specific outcomes? Learn more: https://t.co/yvMHoXae2a
RT @EvansCIIS: This month we are focusing on #impsci outcomes. What are #impsci specific outcomes? Learn more: https://t.co/yvMHoXae2a
This month we are focusing on #impsci outcomes. What are #impsci specific outcomes? Learn more: https://t.co/yvMHoXae2a
RT @IRIfellowship: And implementation outcomes; which are different than client outcomes; which are different than service outcomes... and…
RT @IRIfellowship: And implementation outcomes; which are different than client outcomes; which are different than service outcomes... and…
And implementation outcomes; which are different than client outcomes; which are different than service outcomes... and all of them matter: https://t.co/pfwS2B3zJF
"Outcomes for Implementation Research: Conceptual Distinctions, Measurement Challenges, and Research Agenda" A few years old, but valuable https://t.co/4HOpj4WHbM
Outcomes for Implementation Research: Conceptual Distinctions, Measurement Challenges, and Research Agenda https://t.co/1NYVY32chh #IMPRNT16
#KTSI2014 David Chambers: look more closely at implementation outcomes http://t.co/aaxirPrIa9