↓ Skip to main content

Survey on clinical prediction models for diabetes prediction

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Big Data, August 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
62 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
142 Mendeley
Title
Survey on clinical prediction models for diabetes prediction
Published in
Journal of Big Data, August 2017
DOI 10.1186/s40537-017-0082-7
Authors

N. Jayanthi, B. Vijaya Babu, N. Sambasiva Rao

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 142 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 142 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 18%
Student > Master 18 13%
Researcher 15 11%
Student > Bachelor 11 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 6%
Other 25 18%
Unknown 39 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 48 34%
Engineering 12 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 6 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 4%
Other 18 13%
Unknown 46 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 August 2017.
All research outputs
#15,477,045
of 22,999,744 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Big Data
#202
of 339 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#199,102
of 317,355 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Big Data
#5
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,999,744 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 339 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.3. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 317,355 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.