↓ Skip to main content

Politics of the precautionary principle: assessing actors’ preferences in water protection policy

Overview of attention for article published in Policy Sciences, August 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
60 Mendeley
Title
Politics of the precautionary principle: assessing actors’ preferences in water protection policy
Published in
Policy Sciences, August 2017
DOI 10.1007/s11077-017-9295-z
Authors

Florence Metz, Karin Ingold

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 60 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 23%
Researcher 7 12%
Student > Master 5 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 7%
Lecturer 3 5%
Other 9 15%
Unknown 18 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 11 18%
Environmental Science 9 15%
Business, Management and Accounting 5 8%
Arts and Humanities 5 8%
Computer Science 2 3%
Other 8 13%
Unknown 20 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 August 2017.
All research outputs
#17,913,495
of 22,999,744 outputs
Outputs from Policy Sciences
#412
of 433 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#227,704
of 317,366 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Policy Sciences
#6
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,999,744 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 433 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.2. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 317,366 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.