| Title |
The Development of an Animal Welfare Impact Assessment (AWIA) Tool and Its Application to Bovine Tuberculosis and Badger Control in England
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, August 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10806-017-9684-5 |
| Authors |
Steven P. McCulloch, Michael J. Reiss |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 182 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 72 | 40% |
| United States | 6 | 3% |
| Australia | 3 | 2% |
| France | 3 | 2% |
| Canada | 2 | 1% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Belarus | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 9 | 5% |
| Unknown | 82 | 45% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 163 | 90% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 4% |
| Scientists | 6 | 3% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 6 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 36 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 14% |
| Researcher | 4 | 11% |
| Other | 3 | 8% |
| Professor | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 5 | 14% |
| Unknown | 9 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 22% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 6 | 17% |
| Environmental Science | 3 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 6 | 17% |
| Unknown | 10 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 175. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 April 2022.
All research outputs
#233,265
of 25,661,882 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics
#5
of 418 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,991
of 328,188 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics
#1
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,661,882 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 418 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,188 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.