↓ Skip to main content

Data Science as Machinic Neoplatonism

Overview of attention for article published in Philosophy & Technology, August 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#6 of 159)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
58 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
Title
Data Science as Machinic Neoplatonism
Published in
Philosophy & Technology, August 2017
DOI 10.1007/s13347-017-0273-3
Authors

Dan McQuillan

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 58 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 20%
Other 1 20%
Student > Master 1 20%
Researcher 1 20%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 20%
Other 0 0%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 2 40%
Social Sciences 2 40%
Philosophy 1 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 41. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 February 2018.
All research outputs
#269,500
of 9,077,438 outputs
Outputs from Philosophy & Technology
#6
of 159 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,108
of 249,899 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Philosophy & Technology
#1
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 9,077,438 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 159 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 249,899 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.