| Title |
International comparison of cost of falls in older adults living in the community: a systematic review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Osteoporosis International, February 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00198-009-1162-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
J. C. Davis, M. C. Robertson, M. C. Ashe, T. Liu-Ambrose, K. M. Khan, C. A. Marra |
| Abstract |
Our objective was to determine international estimates of the economic burden of falls in older people living in the community. Our systematic review emphasized the need for a consensus on methodology for cost of falls studies to enable more accurate comparisons and subgroup-specific estimates among different countries. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 258 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 254 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 44 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 35 | 14% |
| Researcher | 33 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 22 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 18 | 7% |
| Other | 54 | 21% |
| Unknown | 52 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 64 | 25% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 47 | 18% |
| Engineering | 15 | 6% |
| Sports and Recreations | 12 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 10 | 4% |
| Other | 46 | 18% |
| Unknown | 64 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 August 2011.
All research outputs
#13,352,626
of 22,649,029 outputs
Outputs from Osteoporosis International
#1,955
of 3,595 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#73,424
of 93,427 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Osteoporosis International
#11
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,649,029 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,595 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 93,427 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.