↓ Skip to main content

International comparison of cost of falls in older adults living in the community: a systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in Osteoporosis International, February 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
136 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
156 Mendeley
Title
International comparison of cost of falls in older adults living in the community: a systematic review
Published in
Osteoporosis International, February 2010
DOI 10.1007/s00198-009-1162-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

J. C. Davis, M. C. Robertson, M. C. Ashe, T. Liu-Ambrose, K. M. Khan, C. A. Marra

Abstract

Our objective was to determine international estimates of the economic burden of falls in older people living in the community. Our systematic review emphasized the need for a consensus on methodology for cost of falls studies to enable more accurate comparisons and subgroup-specific estimates among different countries.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 156 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 152 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 18%
Student > Master 27 17%
Researcher 25 16%
Student > Bachelor 14 9%
Unspecified 14 9%
Other 48 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 47 30%
Nursing and Health Professions 30 19%
Unspecified 25 16%
Engineering 13 8%
Sports and Recreations 7 4%
Other 34 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 August 2011.
All research outputs
#6,598,677
of 12,226,184 outputs
Outputs from Osteoporosis International
#1,223
of 2,497 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,845
of 92,213 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Osteoporosis International
#18
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,226,184 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,497 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 92,213 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.