↓ Skip to main content

Improved sqrt-cosine similarity measurement

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Big Data, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

q&a
3 Q&A threads

Citations

dimensions_citation
69 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
104 Mendeley
Title
Improved sqrt-cosine similarity measurement
Published in
Journal of Big Data, July 2017
DOI 10.1186/s40537-017-0083-6
Authors

Sahar Sohangir, Dingding Wang

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 104 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 104 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 14%
Student > Master 13 13%
Student > Bachelor 13 13%
Lecturer 7 7%
Researcher 7 7%
Other 13 13%
Unknown 36 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 31 30%
Engineering 14 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 4%
Social Sciences 3 3%
Other 12 12%
Unknown 36 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 April 2019.
All research outputs
#4,053,895
of 23,577,761 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Big Data
#73
of 356 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#69,006
of 318,055 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Big Data
#1
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,761 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 356 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 318,055 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them