Peer 4
Retraction Watch provides relevant details:http://retractionwatch.com/2015/12/04/paper-claiming-extra-co2-isnt-always-bad-for-plants-pulled-for-errors/
PubPeer
Unregistered Submission
Now retracted:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11258-015-0541-1
Peer 1
It is not easy to request the retractation of your own paper. I respect the authors' decision to do so.
Unregistered Submission
In response to issues raised on this forum and our review of the original data, we have requested that the journal retract our paper. All inquiries should be addressed to the lead author, Benjamin…
Peer 1
Duval et al. might wish to address additional errors in their database prior to publishing their erratum in Plant Ecology (the list below is likely to be non-exhaustive):Supporting Information Table 1…
Peer 4
Another error in the CO2 database: From Campbell and Sage (2002), the authors recorded no effect of elevated CO2 on P in lupin. However, Campbell
Peer 3
Reply to comment on “Duval, B.D., Blankinship, J.C., Dijkstra, P.
Peer 1
The study investigates elevated CO2 effects on plant nutrients by analyzing data provided in two supporting data files (Supporting Information Table 1 and 2):http://link...