↓ Skip to main content

A New Continuation Criterion for the Relativistic Vlasov–Maxwell System

Overview of attention for article published in Communications in Mathematical Physics, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
Title
A New Continuation Criterion for the Relativistic Vlasov–Maxwell System
Published in
Communications in Mathematical Physics, July 2014
DOI 10.1007/s00220-014-2108-8
Authors

Jonathan Luk, Robert M. Strain

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 33%
Other 1 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 17%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 17%
Unspecified 1 17%
Other 0 0%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 3 50%
Mathematics 3 50%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 June 2014.
All research outputs
#3,133,474
of 4,505,617 outputs
Outputs from Communications in Mathematical Physics
#192,081
of 282,004 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#73,985
of 106,791 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Communications in Mathematical Physics
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 4,505,617 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 282,004 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 106,791 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.