Title |
Reversed phase HPLC analysis of α- and β-carotene from selected raw and cooked vegetables
|
---|---|
Published in |
Plant Foods for Human Nutrition, December 1988
|
DOI | 10.1007/bf01091731 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Jane M. Dietz, Sachi Sri Kantha, John W. Erdman |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Australia | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 80 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 16% |
Researcher | 13 | 16% |
Student > Master | 12 | 15% |
Student > Bachelor | 7 | 9% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 8% |
Other | 17 | 21% |
Unknown | 12 | 15% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 39 | 49% |
Chemistry | 7 | 9% |
Engineering | 3 | 4% |
Environmental Science | 2 | 3% |
Social Sciences | 2 | 3% |
Other | 10 | 13% |
Unknown | 17 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 May 2014.
All research outputs
#6,405,709
of 22,756,196 outputs
Outputs from Plant Foods for Human Nutrition
#223
of 700 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,208
of 53,763 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Foods for Human Nutrition
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,756,196 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 700 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 53,763 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.